{"id":42951,"date":"2019-08-14T07:34:34","date_gmt":"2019-08-14T06:34:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/?p=42951"},"modified":"2019-08-14T18:17:01","modified_gmt":"2019-08-14T17:17:01","slug":"archive-3169","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/archive-3169\/","title":{"rendered":"Archive 3169"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>&#8220;DON&#8217;T TOUCH THAT DIAL!&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 THE NEW AGE PRACTICE OF CHANNELING<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>copyright 1988 by Eric Pement<\/p>\n<p>Nov. 28, 1988<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>They close their eyes and lips. For a minute or two, sitting with<\/p>\n<p>quiet focus, they breathe in great volumes of air, sucking up strength<\/p>\n<p>for a momentous journey. Suddenly, another personality takes over and<\/p>\n<p>an alien voice speaks.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Channeling has become one of the paramount landmarks of the New Age<\/p>\n<p>movement, eclipsing herbal cures, mundane astrology, and flotation<\/p>\n<p>tanks. Now an integral part of the Aquarian scene, channelers seem to<\/p>\n<p>have multiplied geometrically in the past fifteen years.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Trying to monitor this wave is an incredible task. Its influence is<\/p>\n<p>propagated through multiple avenues &#8212; radio and TV interviews, private<\/p>\n<p>channeling sessions, cassette distribution, videotape sales and<\/p>\n<p>rentals, newsletters, magazines, mass seminars, conferences, and an<\/p>\n<p>endless stream of channeled literature. (They don&#8217;t call it &#8220;automatic<\/p>\n<p>writing&#8221; for nothing.) Net profits on all this have been estimated at<\/p>\n<p>from 100 to 400 million dollars annually.[1]<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Exactly what is it? Jon Klimo, author of a sympathetic yet thorough<\/p>\n<p>survey of channeling, says it &#8220;is a phenomenon in which otherwise<\/p>\n<p>ordinary people seem to let themselves be taken over by, or in other<\/p>\n<p>ways receive messages from, another personality who uses them as a<\/p>\n<p>conduit, medium, or channel for the communication &#8212; hence the term<\/p>\n<p><em>medium<\/em> or <em>channel<\/em>.&#8221; [2]<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>One of the more popular channelers is J.Z. (Judy Zebra) Knight. She<\/p>\n<p>channels Ramtha, also known as &#8220;the Ram,&#8221; supposedly a 35,000-year-old<\/p>\n<p>being from Atlantis who invented the practice of war. I like Martin<\/p>\n<p>Gardner&#8217;s summary of Ramtha&#8217;s story: &#8220;Slowly he came to realize that he<\/p>\n<p>himself was part of the God he hated. After 63 OBEs [out-of-body<\/p>\n<p>experiences], his body vibrating faster than light, he became one with<\/p>\n<p>the wind. On the side of Mount Indus, in Tibet, free of weight, he<\/p>\n<p>ascended into the Seventh Heaven, where he and God became one. He is<\/p>\n<p>now part of an &#8216;unseen brotherhood&#8217; of superbeings who love us and hear<\/p>\n<p>our prayers.&#8221;\u00a0[3] Ramtha has made Knight a millionairess several times<\/p>\n<p>over; she, in turn, has had Ramtha&#8217;s name copyrighted to prevent anyone<\/p>\n<p>else from channeling him.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Penny Torres and Jach Pursel are the two most popular rivals to J.Z.<\/p>\n<p>Knight. Penny channels Mafu, &#8220;a highly evolved being from the seventh<\/p>\n<p>dimension, last seen on earth when he incarnated as a leper in<\/p>\n<p>first-century Pompeii.&#8221;\u00a0[4] Mafu, like Ramtha, speaks with a Slavic<\/p>\n<p>accent. Meanwhile, Jach Pursel channels Lazaris, a &#8220;group being&#8221; from<\/p>\n<p>beyond time and space who has (have?) never been embodied in our<\/p>\n<p>dimension. Lazaris speaks with a lisp.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The range of &#8220;entities&#8221; supposedly being channeled today is<\/p>\n<p>virtually unlimited. <em>Spirit Speaks<\/em>, a bimonthly magazine from<\/p>\n<p>California, is a <em>Reader&#8217;s Digest<\/em> of messages from various channeled<\/p>\n<p>entities. Some of its regular contributors include Dong How Li (a<\/p>\n<p>Tibetan monk last incarnated 2600 years ago), Gabriel (an angel), Dr.<\/p>\n<p>Peebles (a Scottish physician from the 1800s), and Zoosh (&#8220;a<\/p>\n<p>non-physical being from Alpha Centauri&#8221;).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>An excellent survey of the channeling scene (from a Christian<\/p>\n<p>perspective) is provided in a recent book by John Ankerberg and John<\/p>\n<p>Weldon. They note that the personalities being channeled &#8220;claim to be<\/p>\n<p>various aspects of the human mind or the &#8216;collective&#8217; mind of humanity<\/p>\n<p>. . . They also claim to be the Holy Spirit, troubled ghosts, the<\/p>\n<p>spirits of animals and plants (dolphins, trees, flowers), multiple<\/p>\n<p>human personalities, the inhabitants of mythical cultures (Atlanteans,<\/p>\n<p>Lemurians), and even a possible alien computer that exists in the<\/p>\n<p>future. Critics, realizing that some people are claiming to channel<\/p>\n<p>dolphins, others the spirits of fruits and vegetables and still others<\/p>\n<p>computers from the future, have come to conclude the sanity of the<\/p>\n<p>nation is at risk.&#8221; [5]<\/p>\n<p>HISTORICAL AND BIBLICAL BACKGROUND<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Channeling activity, understood in its wider sense to include spirit<\/p>\n<p>possession in general, can be traced back to the earliest times and<\/p>\n<p>civilizations. The acceptance of animism (the belief that spirits are<\/p>\n<p>present in all of nature, including plants, inert objects, and seasons)<\/p>\n<p>or the practice of ancestor veneration have provided primitive cultures<\/p>\n<p>with sufficient groundwork for the rise of spiritism. Certainly,<\/p>\n<p>spirit mediumship, as well as attempts at spirit-control, can be seen<\/p>\n<p>in shamanism (the activities of the tribal witchdoctor, magician, or<\/p>\n<p>healer in controlling the forces\/spirits of nature).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Channeling can be traced back to the ancient religions of Egypt,<\/p>\n<p>India, and the Near East; thus, we should pay special attention to the<\/p>\n<p>Biblical injunctions on this topic.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The commandments given to Moses after the Exodus from Egypt (about<\/p>\n<p>1400 B.C.) expressly forbid communication with &#8220;spirit mediums&#8221; (Lev.<\/p>\n<p>19:31) [6], or going to one who &#8220;inquires of the dead&#8221; (Deut. 18:11).<\/p>\n<p>Mosaic law prescribed the death penalty both for the medium and for the<\/p>\n<p>person who sought out the medium for advice (Lev. 20:6, 27). Indeed,<\/p>\n<p>one of the chief reasons that King Saul, the first king of Israel, was<\/p>\n<p>slain was for &#8220;going to one who had a familiar spirit, to inquire of<\/p>\n<p>it&#8221; (1 Chron. 10:13). Seven hundred years after Mt. Sinai, in the days<\/p>\n<p>of Isaiah, the prohibition still remained. Those who sought<\/p>\n<p>information from &#8220;mediums and wizards&#8221; were to be answered brusquely:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Should not a people seek their God instead? Should they seek to the<\/p>\n<p>dead on behalf of the living?&#8221; (Isa. 8:19)<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>In New Testament times, possession and control by discarnate spirits<\/p>\n<p>were accepted realities. The actions of Jesus in casting out &#8220;demons&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>and &#8220;unclean spirits&#8221; are mentioned repeatedly in the New Testament<\/p>\n<p>(Matt. 8:28ff, 9:32ff, 12:22ff, 17:14ff, etc.). Jesus likewise<\/p>\n<p>commissioned his apostles to cast out demons (Matt. 10:1) and gave this<\/p>\n<p>authority to others not numbered among the Twelve (Luke 10:17). The<\/p>\n<p>early church continued to conduct exorcisms (Acts 8:7, 19:12).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>An interesting incident regarding a channeler appears in the<\/p>\n<p>sixteenth chapter of the Acts of the Apostles. While Paul and Silas<\/p>\n<p>were evangelizing in Philippi, a city of western Greece, they were<\/p>\n<p>persistently followed by a slave girl &#8220;with a spirit of divination&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>(Acts 16:16). The Greek text literally reads a &#8220;python spirit&#8221; [Gk.<\/p>\n<p><em>pneuma puthona<\/em>], a reference to an entity named The Python, which<\/p>\n<p>inhabited the high priestess of the temple of Apollo at Delphi.<\/p>\n<p>(Remember hearing about &#8220;the oracle of Delphi&#8221; in school? That was<\/p>\n<p>her.) &#8220;The Python&#8221; or &#8220;python spirit&#8221; later became a generic term for<\/p>\n<p>a discarnate entity which predicted the future. The apostle Paul<\/p>\n<p>finally &#8220;turned and said to the spirit, &#8216;I command you in the name of<\/p>\n<p>Jesus Christ to come out of her.&#8217; And he came out that very hour.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>(Acts 16:18)<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>It bears noting that this spirit of divination evidently could<\/p>\n<p>provide some genuine information (verse 16). This was not a natural<\/p>\n<p>ability, nor was the woman using methods of fraud or &#8220;cold reading,&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>because when Paul cast out the spirit, she lost her powers and the<\/p>\n<p>ability to make money for her owners (v. 19). If the woman had been<\/p>\n<p>drawing upon a natural talent or using a swindle technique, she should<\/p>\n<p>still have been able to earn money by deception, as previously. In any<\/p>\n<p>case, this was not a power the Lord wanted in her life, and through the<\/p>\n<p>authority of Jesus Christ it was cast out.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>CHANNELING IN MAJOR RELIGIONS<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>For centuries, among monotheistic cultures spirit communication was<\/p>\n<p>usually limited to spirits of divine origin (God, Jesus, one of the<\/p>\n<p>angels, etc.). Muhammad claimed multiple encounters with the angel<\/p>\n<p>Gabriel, whose messages are preserved in the Qur&#8217;an. In the Middle<\/p>\n<p>Ages, Roman Catholic mystics were permitted visions and appearances of<\/p>\n<p>Jesus or the Virgin Mary.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Emmanuel Swedenborg (1688-1772), the brilliant metallurgist,<\/p>\n<p>inventor and scientist of the eighteenth century, abandoned his career<\/p>\n<p>for spiritism. Claiming to be in contact with angels, he wrote<\/p>\n<p>prodigious treatises and commentaries based on these visions and<\/p>\n<p>communications, and founded a major cultic movement influential among<\/p>\n<p>European and American intellectuals. In nineteenth-century America<\/p>\n<p>several cults, such as the Mormons and the Shakers, claimed communion<\/p>\n<p>with angels or spirits of the dead.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Mary Baker Eddy often attempted to distinguish Christian Science<\/p>\n<p>(which she founded) from spiritualism. Yet she herself acted as a<\/p>\n<p>trance channeler briefly before &#8220;discovering&#8221; Christian Science (1866).<\/p>\n<p>In <em>The Life of Mary Baker G. Eddy and the History of Christian <\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Science<\/em>, Georgine Milmine describes the experiences of Mary Baker<\/p>\n<p>Patterson (who later became Mrs. Eddy). Mary Baker Patterson channeled<\/p>\n<p>the spirit of her dead brother Albert in 1864 (or claimed to, anyway).<\/p>\n<p>Milmine&#8217;s book reproduces a photograph of automatic writing,<\/p>\n<p>purportedly from Albert, in Mary&#8217;s hand. [7] Two years later, in the<\/p>\n<p>company of other spiritualists, Mrs. Patterson [Eddy] acted as a trance<\/p>\n<p>medium, this time claiming to channel only the spirits of the Apostles<\/p>\n<p>and of Jesus Christ. [8]<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The channeling floodgates opened in this country in the<\/p>\n<p>mid-nineteenth century with the advent of spiritualism, the attempt to<\/p>\n<p>communicate with spirits of the dead. Historians almost universally<\/p>\n<p>trace the origin of the spiritualist movement to 1848 in Hydesville,<\/p>\n<p>New York, with the Fox sisters, Margaret and Kate.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Margaret was 14 and Kate was 11 when they first heard the sounds of<\/p>\n<p>knocking, furniture being moved, and other sounds in various rooms of<\/p>\n<p>their home, in late 1847. [9] At these times, their beds would vibrate<\/p>\n<p>and shake without any reason. The children were terrified and Mrs.<\/p>\n<p>Fox&#8217;s hair turned white through this ordeal. [10]<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>On the night of March 31, 1848, 12-year-old Kate challenged these<\/p>\n<p>unseen powers to repeat the snaps of her fingers, which they did. Each<\/p>\n<p>number of snaps would be followed by the same number of raps, and thus<\/p>\n<p>the girls began to communicate with the spirits. News spread rapidly,<\/p>\n<p>and the family home was visited by interested writers and curiosity<\/p>\n<p>seekers. The sisters began to hold seances, communicating with the<\/p>\n<p>spirits by means of a simple code. In mid-April, Kate&#8217;s parents sent<\/p>\n<p>her away to live with her older sister Leah in Rochester, N.Y., hoping<\/p>\n<p>to quell the disruption it had caused the family. (The spirits were<\/p>\n<p>usually more active in Kate&#8217;s presence.) The rappings immediately<\/p>\n<p>spread to Leah&#8217;s house, and Leah also became a believer.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The first message the Fox sisters received was this:<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Dear friends, you must proclaim these truths to the world.<\/p>\n<p>This is the dawning of a new era, and you must not try to conceal<\/p>\n<p>it any longer. When you do your duty, God will protect you and<\/p>\n<p>good spirits will watch over you. [11]<\/p>\n<p>Fascination with spiritualism spread like wildfire, and within 30<\/p>\n<p>years there were tens of thousands of spiritualists in the U.S.,<\/p>\n<p>England, and across Europe, and national organizations were formed. In<\/p>\n<p>1855 the first national spiritualist newspaper was issued in England;<\/p>\n<p>in 1866 a national conference was held in Rhode Island, where<\/p>\n<p>resolutions were passed that citizens should abandon all Christian<\/p>\n<p>ordinances and worship and close down all Sunday schools. In 1870, Sir<\/p>\n<p>William Crookes, famed British scientist who invented the Crookes tube<\/p>\n<p>(forerunner of the modern picture tube), called on the nation&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>scientists to investigate spiritualism. Seeking to contact his dead<\/p>\n<p>daughter, Crookes was convinced of spiritualism&#8217;s validity.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Queen Victoria consulted several mediums, hoping to speak with her<\/p>\n<p>late husband Prince Albert, who died in 1861. Seances were held at the<\/p>\n<p>White House under Lincoln&#8217;s presidency. British prime minister William<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Gladstone, Canadian prime minister MacKenzie King, and Sir Arthur<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Conan Doyle (creator of Sherlock Holmes) were all converts to<\/p>\n<p>spiritualism.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Famed magician and escape artist Harry Houdini tried to prevent<\/p>\n<p>Conan Doyle from being duped by crank mediums, but Doyle remained<\/p>\n<p>convinced that the spiritualists had true supernatural powers. He<\/p>\n<p>believed spiritualism was &#8220;a new revelation&#8221; to mankind.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Christianity must be modified by this new revelation,&#8221; Doyle wrote,<\/p>\n<p>referring to spiritualism and psychic phenomena generally. &#8220;One can<\/p>\n<p>see no justice in a vicarious sacrifice, nor in the God who could be<\/p>\n<p>placated by such means. Above all, many cannot understand such<\/p>\n<p>expressions as the &#8216;redemption from sin,&#8217; &#8216;cleansed by the blood of the<\/p>\n<p>Lamb,&#8217; and so forth.&#8221; [12]<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Houdini&#8217;s 1924 autobiography, <em>Houdini: A Magician Among the <\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Spirits<\/em>, is a fascinating account of the origins and numerous frauds<\/p>\n<p>connected with nineteenth-century spiritualism. After over thirty<\/p>\n<p>years of research, he wrote, &#8220;I have accumulated one of the largest<\/p>\n<p>libraries in the world on psychic phenomena, Spiritualism, magic,<\/p>\n<p>witchcraft, demonology, evil spirits, etc., some of the material going<\/p>\n<p>as far back as 1489, . . . but nothing I ever read concerning the<\/p>\n<p>so-called Spiritualistic phenomena has impressed me as being<\/p>\n<p>genuine.&#8221; [13]<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>It was not Houdini, however, who struck the greatest blow against<\/p>\n<p>spiritualism. A shattering revelation had come a generation earlier,<\/p>\n<p>from Margaret and Kate Fox themselves.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Forty years after the Fox sisters told the world of the spirit<\/p>\n<p>rappings, both confessed they were frauds. On October 21, 1888,<\/p>\n<p>54-year-old Margaret Fox gave a public confession at the New York<\/p>\n<p>Academy of Music, before an audience of over two thousand people.<\/p>\n<p>Standing in her stocking feet on a small pine table on the stage, she<\/p>\n<p>produced loud, distinct raps which could be heard throughout the<\/p>\n<p>building. Her sister likewise gave consent. That same year, she told<\/p>\n<p>a crowd, &#8220;I am here tonight, as one of the founders of Spiritualism, to<\/p>\n<p>denounce it as absolute falsehood . . . the most wicked blasphemy the<\/p>\n<p>world has ever known.&#8221; [14]<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>One year later, they changed their minds, and both recanted their<\/p>\n<p>previous confessions! They claimed the spirit manifestations had<\/p>\n<p>always been genuine, and they had never tricked anyone with false<\/p>\n<p>knocks or raps, retracting all they had said in 1888. The Fox sisters<\/p>\n<p>had become alcoholics in the 1860s, and fellow spiritualists claimed<\/p>\n<p>their confessions had been bought off. The last years of their lives<\/p>\n<p>were spent in drunkenness, and their public speech now contained little<\/p>\n<p>more than profanity. Both died as alcoholics, Kate in 1892 and<\/p>\n<p>Margaret in 1893, both cursing God as they died. [15]<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>CHANNELING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Spiritualism by no means disappeared with the death of the Fox<\/p>\n<p>sisters. In fact, it diversified into spiritualist sects which<\/p>\n<p>could be rationalistic (strongly anti-Christian), average (mildly<\/p>\n<p>anti-Christian), and strongly religious, complete with sacraments and<\/p>\n<p>baptism. The spiritualist movement also provided the impetus for the<\/p>\n<p>study of psychic research and parapsychology.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The early quarter of the twentieth century witnessed the epiphany<\/p>\n<p>of a few shining stars in the astral firmament. Two of these were<\/p>\n<p>channeled books, the other was the so-called &#8220;sleeping prophet,&#8221; Edgar<\/p>\n<p>Cayce (1877-1945).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Cayce was raised in rural Kentucky. His parents were Campbellites.<\/p>\n<p>He claimed to see &#8220;little people&#8221; as a child. The turning point in his<\/p>\n<p>life occurred in 1901, at the age of 24. Cayce had been suffering from<\/p>\n<p>a chronic case of laryngitis and voice loss after contracting a cold a<\/p>\n<p>year earlier. In desperation, he turned to a hypnotist, Al Layne.<\/p>\n<p>After Cayce had entered a deep trance, Layne asked him to diagnose the<\/p>\n<p>cause of his hoarseness.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Immediately the fateful words came forth: &#8216;Yes, we can see the<\/p>\n<p>body.&#8217; The voice diagnosed the problem as insufficient circulation.<\/p>\n<p>Layne gave a suggestion that the body cure itself. Cayce&#8217;s neck grew<\/p>\n<p>pink, then bright red. Twenty minutes later, it became normal again.<\/p>\n<p>Layne told Cayce to wake up, and when he did, his voice had returned.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>[16] So goes the story in the Cayce biographies.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Cayce&#8217;s life was changed permanently. News of this story spread,<\/p>\n<p>and Cayce&#8217;s neighbors asked him to diagnose their diseases for them.<\/p>\n<p>Cayce learned how to put himself in a trance state fairly quickly, and<\/p>\n<p>after he appeared to fall asleep, the voice would take over and<\/p>\n<p>prescribe various unorthodox cures which always seemed to work.<\/p>\n<p>Eventually, the questioners began to ask him about spiritual matters,<\/p>\n<p>and from then on Cayce channeled metaphysical &#8220;truths,&#8221; promoting<\/p>\n<p>reincarnation, monism, astrology, gnosticism, Atlantis, mediumship,<\/p>\n<p>etc. Cayce&#8217;s followers were devoted to these &#8220;readings,&#8221; and over<\/p>\n<p>14,000 trance sessions have been transcribed, cataloged, and indexed<\/p>\n<p>since his death. This material forms a vast body of occult reference<\/p>\n<p>material which has been used for decades.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Equally potent has been <em>The Aquarian Gospel of Jesus the Christ<\/em>,<\/p>\n<p>published in 1907, channeled through Levi Dowling, who was purportedly<\/p>\n<p>empowered to read the &#8220;Akashic Records&#8221; (a scribal form of the<\/p>\n<p>Universal Mind, containing all the history of the universe). Levi&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p><em>Aquarian Gospel<\/em> has provided a mythical history of the life of Christ<\/p>\n<p>picked up by many cults and New Age devotees. It describes a<\/p>\n<p>reincarnated Jesus, who attained Christ consciousness after visiting<\/p>\n<p>Egypt, Greece, and India, during the so-called &#8220;silent years&#8221; before<\/p>\n<p>his public ministry in Palestine. [17]<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>For a book supposedly transcribed from the Akashic records, <em>The <\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Aquarian Gospel<\/em> is riddled with error, beginning from its first verse.<\/p>\n<p>It says &#8220;Herod Antipas was ruler of Jerusalem&#8221; when Jesus was born.<\/p>\n<p>That should have been Herod the Great, not Herod Antipas. It has Jesus<\/p>\n<p>visiting Lahore in Pakistan (31.1); Lahore didn&#8217;t historically exist<\/p>\n<p>until 600 years later. It shows Jesus visiting magicians in Persepolis<\/p>\n<p>(39.1); Persepolis was destroyed by Alexander the Great in 330 B.C. and<\/p>\n<p>was never rebuilt. Nonetheless, this book has been adopted by many<\/p>\n<p>unwitting readers as &#8220;proof&#8221; of a secret occult past for Jesus Christ.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><em>The Urantia Book<\/em> was also obtained through trance channeling. Its<\/p>\n<p>unknown author served as a medium for dozens of extraterrestrial<\/p>\n<p>intelligences, beginning in the early 1900s. (&#8220;Urantia&#8221; is the name<\/p>\n<p>these space beings give to the planet earth.) Ironically, it was a<\/p>\n<p>Seventh-day Adventist minister and physician, who had spent over a<\/p>\n<p>decade debunking and refuting spiritualism, who was ultimately<\/p>\n<p>responsible for the publication of the Urantia papers. Dr. William<\/p>\n<p>Sadler finally found a channeler he couldn&#8217;t expose as a fraud, whose<\/p>\n<p>entities were utterly inexplicable.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Beginning in 1923, Dr. Sadler invited a group of friends, informally<\/p>\n<p>known as The Forum, to examine and question these intelligences, which<\/p>\n<p>were rapidly becoming more numerous. The channeler began producing<\/p>\n<p>automatic writing in response to their questions, and eleven years<\/p>\n<p>later these papers were completed. The entities asked Dr. Sadler, by<\/p>\n<p>now a true believer, that the work be published, though it wasn&#8217;t until<\/p>\n<p>1955 that the 2100-page volume made it into print. [18] The <em>Urantia<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Book<\/em> has influenced thousands of people, and is fully consistent with<\/p>\n<p>New Age ideology.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>THE ADVENT OF MODERN CHANNELING<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>It would be hard to say just where &#8220;modern&#8221; channeling practices<\/p>\n<p>should be dated from, but I&#8217;m inclined to point to the Seth material,<\/p>\n<p>channeled through the late Jane Roberts (died 1984). Jane, a housewife<\/p>\n<p>and would-be writer, first encountered &#8220;Seth&#8221; through a spontaneous<\/p>\n<p>experience in September 1963. Jane said &#8220;a fantastic avalanche of<\/p>\n<p>radical, new ideas burst into my head with tremendous force,&#8221; not<\/p>\n<p>unlike an LSD trip. [19]<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Jane transmitted this material for over twenty years and, like most<\/p>\n<p>channeled writing, it is amazingly consistent with New Age philosophy<\/p>\n<p>(reality is a construct of our minds, etc.). Jane Roberts was the<\/p>\n<p>first contemporary channeler to gain widespread acceptance in the<\/p>\n<p>1970s, and since then the volume of channelers and channeled writings<\/p>\n<p>has fallen on our society like a deluge.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>How does channeling fit in the larger picture? We interviewed Joel<\/p>\n<p>Bjorling, author of a forthcoming bibliography on channeling. Since<\/p>\n<p>he&#8217;s up to his eyeballs in studying channeled writings, we asked him<\/p>\n<p>how contemporary channeling differs from its nineteenth-century<\/p>\n<p>predecessor. He pointed out that in terms of content (i.e., what is<\/p>\n<p>taught), both have the same philosophy and share a common root. The<\/p>\n<p>outward phenomenon is also similar &#8212; in both cases, a disembodied<\/p>\n<p>entity speaks through the channeler, usually in a trance state.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>One difference this author has observed is that the spiritualist<\/p>\n<p>movement focused on seances (dim lights, formal invocations, etc.) and<\/p>\n<p>supernatural manifestations &#8212; table lifting, &#8220;direct voice&#8221; phenomena,<\/p>\n<p>ectoplasm, materialized writing or faces, etc. By contrast, today&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>channelers do everything under bright lights, usually on stage, and the<\/p>\n<p>only visible event is when an alien personality takes them over. The<\/p>\n<p>channelers usually don&#8217;t exhibit the powers or physical phenomena, such<\/p>\n<p>as levitation, that were present in spiritualism. (This may be due to<\/p>\n<p>the development of infrared photography, but that&#8217;s another matter.)<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The basic themes have also differed. In spiritualism, the emphasis<\/p>\n<p>was on &#8220;proof of survival&#8221; after death, and the public largely sought<\/p>\n<p>reassurance that their deceased loved ones were happy in the Great<\/p>\n<p>Beyond. In modern channeling, the focus is on &#8220;higher intelligences&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>who have come to teach us Truth, showing us how to alter reality and<\/p>\n<p>achieve self-fulfillment.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Modern channeling centers around certain themes: (1) we are all<\/p>\n<p>God(s), (2) there is no death, (3) reality is a product of the mind,<\/p>\n<p>(4) prosperity is our right and &#8220;we can have it all,&#8221; and (5) we must<\/p>\n<p>preserve the earth from nuclear or ecological catastrophe. This last<\/p>\n<p>point is especially prevalent among UFO contactees, who communicate<\/p>\n<p>telepathically with various &#8220;space brothers&#8221; (their term). The UFOs<\/p>\n<p>generally warn that continued testing of nuclear weapons will disturb<\/p>\n<p>the earth&#8217;s rotation or cause some kind of interplanetary disaster.<\/p>\n<p>The space brothers are also concerned about environmental pollution on<\/p>\n<p>our own planet.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Despite the differences between the two movements, both<\/p>\n<p>spiritualists and channelers are agreed that the traditional Christian<\/p>\n<p>concept of God is false. Consider the following statement:<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Agreement [among channelers] can be said to exist on one<\/p>\n<p>point only, namely, that the historic Christian doctrine<\/p>\n<p>respecting the nature and character of the Deity is an<\/p>\n<p>imposition, the fabric of an artificial scholastic<\/p>\n<p>philosophy, and contradicted by sound reason as well as<\/p>\n<p>by the unanimous testimony of the spirit world. It is<\/p>\n<p>certainly a remarkable fact that on this point the<\/p>\n<p>higher intelligences are strangely unanimous and emphatic<\/p>\n<p>in their statements, and all spiritualists are agreed. [20]<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Though this observation seems strikingly contemporary, it was<\/p>\n<p>actually written over 80 years ago, in an analysis of the spiritualist<\/p>\n<p>movement. We believe the parallels are too close to be coincidental.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>CONCLUDING REMARKS<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Is all channeling Satanic? In the direct sense, no. Many<\/p>\n<p>channelers are not communicating with any spirit, but are simply<\/p>\n<p>hucksters who have &#8220;learned the rap&#8221; and are capitalizing on the<\/p>\n<p>current fascination with discarnate intelligences. J.Z. Knight may be<\/p>\n<p>one such person &#8212; former followers testify to having seen her practice<\/p>\n<p>Ramtha&#8217;s mannerisms, speech patterns, and accent.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Personally, I have adopted Occam&#8217;s Razor when dealing with most<\/p>\n<p>supernatural claims. Named after William of Occam, this principle of<\/p>\n<p>logic states that when several explanations or solutions to a problem<\/p>\n<p>are possible, the simplest is to be preferred to the more complex. As<\/p>\n<p>he phrased it, &#8220;Entities are not to be multiplied beyond necessity.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>William was undoubtedly using &#8220;entities&#8221; as a synonym for explanations,<\/p>\n<p>but in this context I find the phraseology excruciatingly apropos.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Some channelers may not be intentional fakers, but self-deceived<\/p>\n<p>instead. I have known individuals who couldn&#8217;t tell the difference<\/p>\n<p>between their own wayward thoughts and the voice of God. Stream-of-<\/p>\n<p>consciousness musings and personal urges have been mistaken by some for<\/p>\n<p>divine revelation. Self-deception of this sort can range all the way<\/p>\n<p>to outright mental illness.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>I also don&#8217;t discount the possibility that some trance channeling<\/p>\n<p>may arise from a one&#8217;s own unconscious self-will. For instance, a<\/p>\n<p>voice which claims to be Sushi from Napaj, a deity of great power and<\/p>\n<p>pomp, may simply spring from the inner fantasies of the unregenerate<\/p>\n<p>mind. Those who believe in man&#8217;s depravity should consider that man&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>own evil heart may well be the source of the channelers&#8217; vulgar<\/p>\n<p>pronouncements.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Yet we cannot deny the reality of the spiritual realm. Both<\/p>\n<p>Scripture and experience show that certain phenomena can only be<\/p>\n<p>accounted for by demonic spirits. History records intrusions of the<\/p>\n<p>demonic throughout all times and cultures, and we have no less an<\/p>\n<p>authority than the Lord Jesus Christ himself who testifies to the<\/p>\n<p>reality of this fact &#8212; and to his own power to save men from the<\/p>\n<p>powers of darkness.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>In the preceding discussion, though Satan need not be the immediate<\/p>\n<p>source of a channeled message, he may be the remote cause behind it.<\/p>\n<p>Jesus called Satan &#8220;a liar and the father of it&#8221; (John 8:44) and<\/p>\n<p>Satan&#8217;s parentage to occult sin is sure even though it may not be<\/p>\n<p>immediate. On one level, whether channeling is &#8220;real&#8221; or &#8220;faked&#8221; is<\/p>\n<p>immaterial; the person who seeks after &#8220;mediums and spiritists to<\/p>\n<p>prostitute himself by following them&#8221; will be alienated from the<\/p>\n<p>presence of God and subject to judgment (Lev. 20:6).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>A man may forfeit his soul for counterfeit money just as surely as<\/p>\n<p>for &#8220;real&#8221; money. But the effect of each loss will be the same,<\/p>\n<p>regardless of the currency used. And in like manner, ultimately it&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>not the medium of exchange which matters but the consequences of the<\/p>\n<p>transaction.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>REFERENCES:<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>1. Katharine Lowry, &#8220;Channelers,&#8221; OMNI, Oct. 1987, p. 50.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"2\">\n<li>2. Jon Klimo, CHANNELING: INVESTIGATIONS ON RECEIVING INFORMATION FROM<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>PARANORMAL SOURCES (Los Angeles: Jeremy P. Tarcher, Inc., 1987), p. 1.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li>3. Martin Gardner, THE NEW AGE: NOTES OF A FRINGE WATCHER (Buffalo:<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Prometheus Books, 1988), p. 195.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"4\">\n<li>4. Brooks Alexander, &#8220;Theology from the Twilight Zone,&#8221; CHRISTIANITY<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>TODAY, Sept. 18, 1987, p. 22.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"5\">\n<li>5. John Ankerberg and John Weldon, THE FACTS ON SPIRIT GUIDES (Eugene,<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Ore: Harvest House Publishers, 1988), p. 16.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"6\">\n<li>6. The Hebrew word here translated &#8220;mediums&#8221; (NASV) or &#8220;them that have<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>familiar spirits&#8221; (KJV) is the Hebrew word <em>&#8216;obh<\/em>. It appears 16 times<\/p>\n<p>in the OT and was used to indicate both spirits and spirit mediums.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"7\">\n<li>7. Georgine Milmine, THE LIFE OF MARY BAKER G. EDDY AND THE HISTORY OF<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>CHRISTIAN SCIENCE (1909: rpt. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1971),<\/p>\n<ol start=\"68\">\n<li>64-68.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"8\">\n<li>8. Milmine, pp. 111, 115-116.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"9\">\n<li>9. The exact year the raps began is dispute (1846-48); 1847 seems most<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>accepted and the birthdates of the sisters is not certain.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"10\">\n<li>10. This account of spiritualism has been taken from several reliable<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>sources and reference books. The reference to Mrs. Fox&#8217;s hair turning<\/p>\n<p>white comes from Raphael Gasson, THE CHALLENGING COUNTERFEIT<\/p>\n<p>(Plainfield, NJ: Logos, 1966), p. 47.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"11\">\n<li>11. Gasson, p. 48; also cited in Klimo, p. 98; and in Nandor Fordor,<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PSYCHIC SCIENCE, London, 1934, ad loc.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"12\">\n<li>12. Arthur Conan Doyle, THE NEW REVELATION (London: Hodder and<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Stoughton, 1918), pp. 70, 71.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"13\">\n<li>13. Harry Houdini, HOUDINI: A MAGICIAN AMONG THE SPIRITS (1924: rpt.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>New York, Arno Press, 1972), p. xix.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"14\">\n<li>14. Gasson, p. 48.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"15\">\n<li>15. Gasson, p. 49.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"16\">\n<li>16. Gary North, UNHOLY SPIRITS: OCCULTISM AND NEW AGE HUMANISM (Fort<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Worth: Dominion Press, 1986), p. 198.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"17\">\n<li>17. See Per Beskow, STRANGE TALES ABOUT JESUS (Philadelphia: Fortress<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Press, 1985), for good summaries of this &#8220;gospel&#8221; and other<\/p>\n<p>pseudo-scriptural forgeries.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"18\">\n<li>18. Steve Cannon, &#8220;Evaluating the Urantia Book,&#8221; PFO NEWSLETTER<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>(quarterly newsletter of Personal Freedom Outreach, St. Louis, Mo.),<\/p>\n<p>vol. 7 (Oct.-Dec. 1987): pp. 4-6.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"19\">\n<li>19. cited by Klimo, p. 30.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"20\">\n<li>20. J. Godfrey Raupert, MODERN SPIRITISM (London: Sands &amp; Co., 1904),<\/li>\n<li>210-211.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; &#8220;DON&#8217;T TOUCH THAT DIAL!&#8221; \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 THE NEW AGE PRACTICE OF CHANNELING &nbsp; copyright 1988 by Eric Pement Nov. 28, 1988 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; They close their eyes and lips. For a minute or two, sitting with quiet focus, they breathe in great volumes of air, sucking up strength for a momentous journey. Suddenly, another [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5322],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-42951","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-archive"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42951","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=42951"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42951\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=42951"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=42951"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=42951"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}