{"id":43677,"date":"2019-12-06T09:21:23","date_gmt":"2019-12-06T09:21:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/?p=43677"},"modified":"2019-12-06T09:21:23","modified_gmt":"2019-12-06T09:21:23","slug":"archive-3570-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/archive-3570-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Archive 3570"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Frontiers of Anthropology <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This blog is to encorporate discussions on Lost Continents, Catastrophism, The origin of Modern Humans and the Out of Africa theory, Genetics and Human Diversity, The Origin and Spread of Civilization and Cultural Diffusion across the face of the Globe.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Deluge of Atlantis<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Deluge of Atlantis<\/p>\n<p><strong>Friday, March 16, 2012<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>More on Fomorians <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I had posted here before about the fomorian pirates of ancient Ireland and I thought St. Patrick&#8217;s day was a good opportunity to add some more on the theory. My theory was that the Formorian giants were a specifically bred caste of warriors of very great size and strength, bred out of CroMagnonlike forebearers (likely the Canary Islander natives as a base), and trained by a life of ritual gladiatorial combats. The physica type I took to be best represented by the Adena &#8220;mound buildes&#8221; and they were the basis of reports of &#8220;Giant skeletons in the mounds&#8221; the giant mercenaries were themselves prized trade items and status symbols for thoe ones that commanded them, and they were shipped far and wide because of that. They were mosty especially associated with the Atlantic seaboard in Europe and ebventually some ended up in the Holy Lands in company of the Philistines (themselves a variety of the Peoples of the Sea) and hence you have the stories of Goliath and hs brothers. Being a highly inbred bunch, they ran to a greater-than-normal frequency of certain mutations such as polydactylity (six fingers on every hand and six toes on wevery foot) and the peculiarity of retaining thre milk teeth while the adult replacement teeth grew in (leading to a double tooth row)<\/p>\n<p>Fomorians<\/p>\n<p><strong>A Dictionary of Celtic Mythology <\/strong><strong>| 2004 <\/strong>| JAMES MacKILLOP | 700+ words | \u00a9 A Dictionary of Celtic Mythology 2004, originally published by Oxford University Press 2004. (Hide copyright information)Copyright<\/p>\n<p><strong>Fomorians, Fomoire, Fom\u00f3iri, Fomoraig, Fomh\u00f3raigh, Fomhoire, Fomorii, Fomor, Fomors, Fomor\u00e9, Fo-Muir, Foawr<\/strong> [Manx]. Malevolent euhemerized deities of the Irish Mythological Cycle, known chiefly from two texts, the <u>*Lebor <\/u>Gab\u00e1la [Book of Invasions] and Cath Maige Tuired [The (Second) Battle of Mag Tuired], in which their portrayals are not coordinate. Although current scholarship agrees on their divine origin, earlier commentators often portrayed them as demonic pirates, probably reading the element <em>m\u00f3r<\/em>&#8211; [phantom] as <em>muir<\/em> [sea]. Early Christian commentators traced the Fomorians to the biblical Ham, son of Noah. Later ecclesiastical storytellers made them either giants or elves, with goat- or horseheads and other misshapen features. While the origins of the Fomorians dates from pre-Christian times, their characterization has been coloured by generations of sea-raiders from the north, first from the Scottish islands and more extensively from the Norse lands; they are often linked to Lochlainn [Scandinavia]. Rejected now is the earlier assumption that the Fomorians were primitive gods of fertility.<\/p>\n<p>When they first appear in the <u>Lebor Gab\u00e1la<\/u>, under their ferocious leader Cichol against the beneficient Partholonians, the Fomorians are portrayed as monstrous and fearful, each having only one eye, one arm, and one leg; see the Irish FER CAILLE and the Scottish Gaelic FACHAN. Later in the text they are more anthropomorphic. While the Fomorians do not fit into the invasion sequence, they prey upon each successive invader, the Partholonians and the Nemedians, until they are defeated by the Tuatha D\u00e9 Danann. Curiously absent are Fomorian attacks on the invaders between the Nemedians of the Tuatha D\u00e9 Danann, the Fir Bolg, prompting some commentators to speculate that the two are identical; later commentators reject this assertion. While associated with several locations, the Fomorians never appear to be settlers in Ireland but instead make raids from their fortress on Tory Island, north of Co. Donegal. In general the Fomorians are wantonly cruel bullies, cutting the noses off those who would not pay them tribute. The Nemedians overcome the Fomorians in three battles until they themselves are defeated at Cn\u00e1mross (distinguish from Fenian battle on the same site). The subsequent humiliations visited upon the Nemedians, especially an exacting annual tribute, cause them to rise up against their Fomorian masters, storming the fortress of Tory Island; they attack Tor Conaind, and the Nemedian champion Fergus Lethderg slays the Fomorian chief Conand. But the Fomorians prevail, and the disappointed Nemedians are scattered around the world.<\/p>\n<p>In <u>Cath Maige Tuired<\/u>, the portrayal of the Fomorians draws more substantially on their divine origin. They intermarry freely with the Tuatha D\u00e9 Danann, the tribe of gods, implying that they are the marine counterparts of the latter. The Fomorian Elatha mac Delba\u00edth, for example, mates with \u00c9riu of the Tuatha D\u00e9 Danann to produce Bres, who inherits the leadership of the Tuatha D\u00e9 Danann from Nuadu Airgetl\u00e1m. The great champion of the Tuatha D\u00e9 Danann, Lug L\u00e1mfhota, is the grandson of a Fomorian. Although the root of the conflict between the Fomorians and the Tuatha D\u00e9 Danann in <u>Cath Maige Tuired<\/u> is extraordinarily deep, the pre-text within the narrative is the unsuitableness of Bres as king: he insults poets and demands humiliating tributes from the race of the gods made subject. Nuadu returns to power and Lug L\u00e1mfhota presents himself in court to aid the cause. The central conflict pits Lug against the Fomorian menace, Balor of the Evil Eye, who is in fact Lug&#8217;s grandfather. In an unexpected turn of events, Lug&#8217;s sling stone drives Balor&#8217;s eye back through his head, directing it towards his Fomorian comrades in arms and thus debilitating them. In the remainder of the story, the Tuatha D\u00e9 Danann rout the Fomorians and, amidst much slaughter, drive them back into the sea.<\/p>\n<p>Other often-cited Fomorians include: \u00c1gach, an enemy of the Tuatha D\u00e9 Danann; Cailitin, a wizard slain by C\u00fachulainn; Corb, a tribal deity; Delga, builder of the fortress of Dun Delgan [Dundalk]; Domnu, the mother of them all; Indech, a king killed at Mag Tuired; L\u00f3bais, druid of the Fomorians; Morc, who emigrated from Africa; N\u00e9it, the war-god; Searbh\u00e1n, the one-eyed keeper of rowan berries, who is sometimes a Fomorian; Tethra, a warrior-chief killed at Mag Tuired. The goat-headed Gaborchend may be derived from the Fomorians.<\/p>\n<p>Under different guises, as demonic pirates or as spirits of the earth, as earlier commentators described them, the Fomorians have appealed to the imaginations of several writers in English. W. B. Yeats spoke often of the Fomorians, whose name he spelled either Fomor or Fomoroh. His sorceress Orchil in <u>The Shadowy Waters<\/u> (1905) and Dhoya (1891), the abandoned giant, are both Fomorians. The Foawr of Manx tradition, initially a local variant of the Fomorians, are stone-throwing giants. See also Alexander H. Krappe, <u>Balor with the Evil Eye<\/u> (New York, 1927).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>JAMES MacKILLOP. &#8220;Fomorians.&#8221; <u>A Dictionary of Celtic Mythology<\/u>. 2004. <em>Encyclopedia.com.<\/em> 16 Mar. 2012 &lt;https:\/\/www.encyclopedia.com&gt;.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;At one point I mentioned that the Fomorians having one eye, one hand and one leg each was like the stereotyped pyrate with an eyepatch, hook and a claw. And on top of that, they were frequently redheaded or &#8220;Redbeards&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Anymore I think that was a darn good and\u00a0sensible way of looking at the thing. And there is even some support for the notion they were associated with the sign of the Skull and Crossed bones, which of course predated the pirate age in Europe by several centuries and is also seen in Precolumbian Mesoamerica.<br \/>\n<strong>Crossbones as a Mayan Symbol of Ixchel<\/strong>:<br \/>\nBones crossed in an &#8220;x&#8221; is Mayan symbol of foreboding. Crossbones are a mortal Mayan symbol calling upon the concept of crossroads, which are considered ominous locations. Bones crossed are symbolic of a juxtaposition between god\/man, life\/death, dark\/light, etc. &#8211; there is a &#8220;meeting of duality&#8221; in this crossed bone gesture. Bones were often left at crossroad sites as a gesture to discard contaminants. For example: If you died of a disease within the community, your bones might have been left at the crossroads as a gesture to &#8220;excommunicate&#8221; the disease that took your body. Crossbones have been identified as adornments on the Ixchel&#8217;s clothing (in some of her renditions). This would imply she could be a sin-eater of sorts. It may also suggest Ixchel morphed into a warrior goddess at some point in the Mayan culture. She has been seen holding a spear and a shield too. These Mayan symbols along with crossbones might reinforce a vengeful attitude, and would suggest Ixchel as fully capable of reaping shrewd judgment in times of tribal war.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>This incidentally parallels the crossed spears of the Egyptian Goddess Neith (Greek Athena)<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fomorians<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Formorians<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In Irish mythology, the <strong>Fomoire<\/strong> (or <strong>Fomorians<\/strong>) are a semi-divine race said to have inhabited Ireland in ancient times. They may have once been believed to be the beings who preceded the gods, similar to the Greek Titans. It has been suggested that they represent the gods of chaos and wild nature, as opposed to the Tuatha D\u00e9 Danann who represent the gods of human civilization. Alternatively, they may represent the gods of a proposed pre-Goidelic population of Ireland.<\/p>\n<p>Name<\/p>\n<p>The race are known as the <em>Fomoire<\/em> or <strong><em>Fomoiri<\/em><\/strong>, names that are often Anglicised as <em>Fomorians<\/em>, <strong><em>Fomors<\/em><\/strong> or <strong><em>Fomori<\/em><\/strong>. Later in Middle Irish they are also known as the <strong><em>Fom\u00f3raig<\/em><\/strong>. The etymology of the name <em>Fomoire<\/em> (plural) has been cause for some debate. Medieval Irish scholars thought the name contained the element <em>muire<\/em> &#8220;sea&#8221;, owing to their reputation as sea pirates.<sup>[1]<\/sup> In 1888, John Rhys was the first to suggest that it is an Old Irish word composed of <em>fo<\/em> &#8220;under\/below&#8221; and <em>muire<\/em> &#8220;sea&#8221;, concluding that it may refer to beings whose (original) habitat is under the sea.<sup>[2]<\/sup> Observing two instances of the early genitive form <em>fomra<\/em>, Kuno Meyer arrives at the same etymology, but takes it to refer to land by the sea.<sup>[3]<\/sup> Whitley Stokes and Rudolf Thurneysen, on the other hand, prefer to connect the second element *<em>mor<\/em> with a supposed Old English cognate <em>mara<\/em> &#8220;mare&#8221; (which survives today in the English word <em>night-mare<\/em>).<sup>[4]<\/sup><sup>[5]<\/sup> Building on these hypotheses, Marie-Louise Sjoestedt interprets the combination of <em>fo<\/em> and the root *<em>mor<\/em> as a compound meaning &#8220;inferior&#8221; or &#8220;latent demons&#8221;.<sup>[6]<\/sup><\/p>\n<p><strong>Characteristics<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>They are sometimes said to have had the body of a man and the head of a goat, [ie, they are stereotyped devils]\u00a0according to an 11th century text in <em>Lebor na hUidre<\/em> (the Book of the Dun Cow), or to have had one eye, one arm and one leg, but some, for example Elatha, the father of Bres, were very beautiful. Bres himself carries the epithet &#8220;the Beautiful.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Irish mythology<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The medieval myth of Partholon says that his followers were the first to invade Ireland after the flood, but the Fomorians were already there: Seathr\u00fan C\u00e9itinn reports a tradition that the Fomorians, led by C\u00edocal, had arrived two hundred years earlier and lived on fish and fowl until Partholon came, bringing the plough and oxen. Partholon defeated C\u00edocal in the Battle of Magh Ithe, but all his people later died of plague.<\/p>\n<p>Then came Nemed and his followers. Ireland is said to have been empty for thirty years following the death of Partholon&#8217;s people, but Nemed and his followers encountered the Fomorians when they arrived. At this point C\u00e9itinn reports another tradition that the Fomorians were seafarers from Africa, descended from Noah&#8217;s son Ham. Nemed defeated them in several battles, killing their kings Gann and Sengann,<sup>[7]<\/sup> but two new Fomorian leaders arose: Conand son of Faebar, who lived in Conand&#8217;s Tower on Tory Island, County Donegal, and Morc son of Dela (note that the first generation of the Fir Bolg were also said to be sons of Dela).<\/p>\n<p>After Nemed&#8217;s death, Conand and Morc enslaved his people and demanded a heavy tribute: two thirds of their children, grain and cattle. Nemed&#8217;s son Fergus Lethderg gathered an army of sixty thousand, rose up against them and destroyed Conand&#8217;s Tower, but Morc attacked them with a huge fleet, and there was great slaughter on both sides. The sea rose over them and drowned most of the survivors: only thirty of Nemed&#8217;s people escaped in a single ship, scattering to the other parts of the world.<\/p>\n<p>The next invasion was by the Fir Bolg, who did not encounter the Fomorians.<\/p>\n<p>Next, the Tuatha D\u00e9 Danann, who are usually supposed to have been the gods of the Goidelic Irish, defeated the Fir Bolg in the first Battle of Magh Tuiredh and took possession of Ireland. Because their king, Nuada, had lost an arm in the battle and was no longer physically whole, their first king in Ireland was the half-Fomorian Bres. He was the result of a union between \u00c9riu of the Tuatha D\u00e9 Danann and the Fomorian prince Elatha, who had come to her one night by sea on a silver boat. Both Elatha and Bres are described as very beautiful. However Bres turned out to be a bad king who forced the Tuatha D\u00e9 to work as slaves and pay tribute to the Fomorians. He lost authority when he was satirized for neglecting his kingly duties of hospitality. Nuada was restored to the kingship after his arm was replaced with a working one of silver, but the Tuatha D\u00e9&#8217;s oppression by the Fomorians continued.<\/p>\n<p>Bres fled to his father, Elatha, and asked for his help to restore him to the kingship. Elatha refused, on the grounds that he should not seek to gain by foul means what he couldn&#8217;t keep by fair. Bres instead turned to Balor, a more warlike Fomorian chief living on Tory Island, and raised an army.<\/p>\n<p>The Tuatha D\u00e9 also prepared for war, under another half-Fomorian leader, Lug. His father was Cia<\/p>\n<p><strong>Frontiers of Anthropology <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This blog is to encorporate discussions on Lost Continents, Catastrophism, The origin of Modern Humans and the Out of Africa theory, Genetics and Human Diversity, The Origin and Spread of Civilization and Cultural Diffusion across the face of the Globe.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Deluge of Atlantis<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Deluge of Atlantis<\/p>\n<p><strong>Friday, March 16, 2012<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>More on Fomorians <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I had posted here before about the fomorian pirates of ancient Ireland and I thought St. Patrick&#8217;s day was a good opportunity to add some more on the theory. My theory was that the Formorian giants were a specifically bred caste of warriors of very great size and strength, bred out of CroMagnonlike forebearers (likely the Canary Islander natives as a base), and trained by a life of ritual gladiatorial combats. The physica type I took to be best represented by the Adena &#8220;mound buildes&#8221; and they were the basis of reports of &#8220;Giant skeletons in the mounds&#8221; the giant mercenaries were themselves prized trade items and status symbols for thoe ones that commanded them, and they were shipped far and wide because of that. They were mosty especially associated with the Atlantic seaboard in Europe and ebventually some ended up in the Holy Lands in company of the Philistines (themselves a variety of the Peoples of the Sea) and hence you have the stories of Goliath and hs brothers. Being a highly inbred bunch, they ran to a greater-than-normal frequency of certain mutations such as polydactylity (six fingers on every hand and six toes on wevery foot) and the peculiarity of retaining thre milk teeth while the adult replacement teeth grew in (leading to a double tooth row)<\/p>\n<p>Fomorians<\/p>\n<p><strong>A Dictionary of Celtic Mythology <\/strong><strong>| 2004 <\/strong>| JAMES MacKILLOP | 700+ words | \u00a9 A Dictionary of Celtic Mythology 2004, originally published by Oxford University Press 2004. (Hide copyright information)Copyright<\/p>\n<p><strong>Fomorians, Fomoire, Fom\u00f3iri, Fomoraig, Fomh\u00f3raigh, Fomhoire, Fomorii, Fomor, Fomors, Fomor\u00e9, Fo-Muir, Foawr<\/strong> [Manx]. Malevolent euhemerized deities of the Irish Mythological Cycle, known chiefly from two texts, the <u>*Lebor <\/u>Gab\u00e1la [Book of Invasions] and Cath Maige Tuired [The (Second) Battle of Mag Tuired], in which their portrayals are not coordinate. Although current scholarship agrees on their divine origin, earlier commentators often portrayed them as demonic pirates, probably reading the element <em>m\u00f3r<\/em>&#8211; [phantom] as <em>muir<\/em> [sea]. Early Christian commentators traced the Fomorians to the biblical Ham, son of Noah. Later ecclesiastical storytellers made them either giants or elves, with goat- or horseheads and other misshapen features. While the origins of the Fomorians dates from pre-Christian times, their characterization has been coloured by generations of sea-raiders from the north, first from the Scottish islands and more extensively from the Norse lands; they are often linked to Lochlainn [Scandinavia]. Rejected now is the earlier assumption that the Fomorians were primitive gods of fertility.<\/p>\n<p>When they first appear in the <u>Lebor Gab\u00e1la<\/u>, under their ferocious leader Cichol against the beneficient Partholonians, the Fomorians are portrayed as monstrous and fearful, each having only one eye, one arm, and one leg; see the Irish FER CAILLE and the Scottish Gaelic FACHAN. Later in the text they are more anthropomorphic. While the Fomorians do not fit into the invasion sequence, they prey upon each successive invader, the Partholonians and the Nemedians, until they are defeated by the Tuatha D\u00e9 Danann. Curiously absent are Fomorian attacks on the invaders between the Nemedians of the Tuatha D\u00e9 Danann, the Fir Bolg, prompting some commentators to speculate that the two are identical; later commentators reject this assertion. While associated with several locations, the Fomorians never appear to be settlers in Ireland but instead make raids from their fortress on Tory Island, north of Co. Donegal. In general the Fomorians are wantonly cruel bullies, cutting the noses off those who would not pay them tribute. The Nemedians overcome the Fomorians in three battles until they themselves are defeated at Cn\u00e1mross (distinguish from Fenian battle on the same site). The subsequent humiliations visited upon the Nemedians, especially an exacting annual tribute, cause them to rise up against their Fomorian masters, storming the fortress of Tory Island; they attack Tor Conaind, and the Nemedian champion Fergus Lethderg slays the Fomorian chief Conand. But the Fomorians prevail, and the disappointed Nemedians are scattered around the world.<\/p>\n<p>In <u>Cath Maige Tuired<\/u>, the portrayal of the Fomorians draws more substantially on their divine origin. They intermarry freely with the Tuatha D\u00e9 Danann, the tribe of gods, implying that they are the marine counterparts of the latter. The Fomorian Elatha mac Delba\u00edth, for example, mates with \u00c9riu of the Tuatha D\u00e9 Danann to produce Bres, who inherits the leadership of the Tuatha D\u00e9 Danann from Nuadu Airgetl\u00e1m. The great champion of the Tuatha D\u00e9 Danann, Lug L\u00e1mfhota, is the grandson of a Fomorian. Although the root of the conflict between the Fomorians and the Tuatha D\u00e9 Danann in <u>Cath Maige Tuired<\/u> is extraordinarily deep, the pre-text within the narrative is the unsuitableness of Bres as king: he insults poets and demands humiliating tributes from the race of the gods made subject. Nuadu returns to power and Lug L\u00e1mfhota presents himself in court to aid the cause. The central conflict pits Lug against the Fomorian menace, Balor of the Evil Eye, who is in fact Lug&#8217;s grandfather. In an unexpected turn of events, Lug&#8217;s sling stone drives Balor&#8217;s eye back through his head, directing it towards his Fomorian comrades in arms and thus debilitating them. In the remainder of the story, the Tuatha D\u00e9 Danann rout the Fomorians and, amidst much slaughter, drive them back into the sea.<\/p>\n<p>Other often-cited Fomorians include: \u00c1gach, an enemy of the Tuatha D\u00e9 Danann; Cailitin, a wizard slain by C\u00fachulainn; Corb, a tribal deity; Delga, builder of the fortress of Dun Delgan [Dundalk]; Domnu, the mother of them all; Indech, a king killed at Mag Tuired; L\u00f3bais, druid of the Fomorians; Morc, who emigrated from Africa; N\u00e9it, the war-god; Searbh\u00e1n, the one-eyed keeper of rowan berries, who is sometimes a Fomorian; Tethra, a warrior-chief killed at Mag Tuired. The goat-headed Gaborchend may be derived from the Fomorians.<\/p>\n<p>Under different guises, as demonic pirates or as spirits of the earth, as earlier commentators described them, the Fomorians have appealed to the imaginations of several writers in English. W. B. Yeats spoke often of the Fomorians, whose name he spelled either Fomor or Fomoroh. His sorceress Orchil in <u>The Shadowy Waters<\/u> (1905) and Dhoya (1891), the abandoned giant, are both Fomorians. The Foawr of Manx tradition, initially a local variant of the Fomorians, are stone-throwing giants. See also Alexander H. Krappe, <u>Balor with the Evil Eye<\/u> (New York, 1927).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>JAMES MacKILLOP. &#8220;Fomorians.&#8221; <u>A Dictionary of Celtic Mythology<\/u>. 2004. <em>Encyclopedia.com.<\/em> 16 Mar. 2012 &lt;https:\/\/www.encyclopedia.com&gt;.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;At one point I mentioned that the Fomorians having one eye, one hand and one leg each was like the stereotyped pyrate with an eyepatch, hook and a claw. And on top of that, they were frequently redheaded or &#8220;Redbeards&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Anymore I think that was a darn good and\u00a0sensible way of looking at the thing. And there is even some support for the notion they were associated with the sign of the Skull and Crossed bones, which of course predated the pirate age in Europe by several centuries and is also seen in Precolumbian Mesoamerica.<br \/>\n<strong>Crossbones as a Mayan Symbol of Ixchel<\/strong>:<br \/>\nBones crossed in an &#8220;x&#8221; is Mayan symbol of foreboding. Crossbones are a mortal Mayan symbol calling upon the concept of crossroads, which are considered ominous locations. Bones crossed are symbolic of a juxtaposition between god\/man, life\/death, dark\/light, etc. &#8211; there is a &#8220;meeting of duality&#8221; in this crossed bone gesture. Bones were often left at crossroad sites as a gesture to discard contaminants. For example: If you died of a disease within the community, your bones might have been left at the crossroads as a gesture to &#8220;excommunicate&#8221; the disease that took your body. Crossbones have been identified as adornments on the Ixchel&#8217;s clothing (in some of her renditions). This would imply she could be a sin-eater of sorts. It may also suggest Ixchel morphed into a warrior goddess at some point in the Mayan culture. She has been seen holding a spear and a shield too. These Mayan symbols along with crossbones might reinforce a vengeful attitude, and would suggest Ixchel as fully capable of reaping shrewd judgment in times of tribal war.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>This incidentally parallels the crossed spears of the Egyptian Goddess Neith (Greek Athena)<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fomorians<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Formorians<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In Irish mythology, the <strong>Fomoire<\/strong> (or <strong>Fomorians<\/strong>) are a semi-divine race said to have inhabited Ireland in ancient times. They may have once been believed to be the beings who preceded the gods, similar to the Greek Titans. It has been suggested that they represent the gods of chaos and wild nature, as opposed to the Tuatha D\u00e9 Danann who represent the gods of human civilization. Alternatively, they may represent the gods of a proposed pre-Goidelic population of Ireland.<\/p>\n<p>Name<\/p>\n<p>The race are known as the <em>Fomoire<\/em> or <strong><em>Fomoiri<\/em><\/strong>, names that are often Anglicised as <em>Fomorians<\/em>, <strong><em>Fomors<\/em><\/strong> or <strong><em>Fomori<\/em><\/strong>. Later in Middle Irish they are also known as the <strong><em>Fom\u00f3raig<\/em><\/strong>. The etymology of the name <em>Fomoire<\/em> (plural) has been cause for some debate. Medieval Irish scholars thought the name contained the element <em>muire<\/em> &#8220;sea&#8221;, owing to their reputation as sea pirates.<sup>[1]<\/sup> In 1888, John Rhys was the first to suggest that it is an Old Irish word composed of <em>fo<\/em> &#8220;under\/below&#8221; and <em>muire<\/em> &#8220;sea&#8221;, concluding that it may refer to beings whose (original) habitat is under the sea.<sup>[2]<\/sup> Observing two instances of the early genitive form <em>fomra<\/em>, Kuno Meyer arrives at the same etymology, but takes it to refer to land by the sea.<sup>[3]<\/sup> Whitley Stokes and Rudolf Thurneysen, on the other hand, prefer to connect the second element *<em>mor<\/em> with a supposed Old English cognate <em>mara<\/em> &#8220;mare&#8221; (which survives today in the English word <em>night-mare<\/em>).<sup>[4]<\/sup><sup>[5<\/sup> Building on these hypotheses, Marie-Louise Sjoestedt interprets the combination of <em>fo<\/em> and the root *<em>mor<\/em> as a compound meaning &#8220;inferior&#8221; or &#8220;latent demons&#8221;.<sup>[6]<\/sup><\/p>\n<p><strong>Characteristics<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>They are sometimes said to have had the body of a man and the head of a goat, [ie, they are stereotyped devils]\u00a0according to an 11th century text in <em>Lebor na hUidre<\/em> (the Book of the Dun Cow), or to have had one eye, one arm and one leg, but some, for example Elatha, the father of Bres, were very beautiful. Bres himself carries the epithet &#8220;the Beautiful.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Irish mythology<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The medieval myth of Partholon says that his followers were the first to invade Ireland after the flood, but the Fomorians were already there: Seathr\u00fan C\u00e9itinn reports a tradition that the Fomorians, led by C\u00edocal, had arrived two hundred years earlier and lived on fish and fowl until Partholon came, bringing the plough and oxen. Partholon defeated C\u00edocal in the Battle of Magh Ithe, but all his people later died of plague.<\/p>\n<p>Then came Nemed and his followers. Ireland is said to have been empty for thirty years following the death of Partholon&#8217;s people, but Nemed and his followers encountered the Fomorians when they arrived. At this point C\u00e9itinn reports another tradition that the Fomorians were seafarers from Africa, descended from Noah&#8217;s son Ham. Nemed defeated them in several battles, killing their kings Gann and Sengann,<sup>[7<\/sup> but two new Fomorian leaders arose: Conand son of Faebar, who lived in Conand&#8217;s Tower on Tory Island, County Donegal, and Morc son of Dela (note that the first generation of the Fir Bolg were also said to be sons of Dela).<\/p>\n<p>After Nemed&#8217;s death, Conand and Morc enslaved his people and demanded a heavy tribute: two thirds of their children, grain and cattle. Nemed&#8217;s son Fergus Lethderg gathered an army of sixty thousand, rose up against them and destroyed Conand&#8217;s Tower, but Morc attacked them with a huge fleet, and there was great slaughter on both sides. The sea rose over them and drowned most of the survivors: only thirty of Nemed&#8217;s people escaped in a single ship, scattering to the other parts of the world.<\/p>\n<p>The next invasion was by the Fir Bolg, who did not encounter the Fomorians.<\/p>\n<p>Next, the Tuatha D\u00e9 Danann, who are usually supposed to have been the gods of the Goidelic Irish, defeated the Fir Bolg in the first Battle of Magh Tuiredh and took possession of Ireland. Because their king, Nuada, had lost an arm in the battle and was no longer physically whole, their first king in Ireland was the half-Fomorian Bres. He was the result of a union between \u00c9riu of the Tuatha D\u00e9 Danann and the Fomorian prince Elatha, who had come to her one night by sea on a silver boat. Both Elatha and Bres are described as very beautiful. However Bres turned out to be a bad king who forced the Tuatha D\u00e9 to work as slaves and pay tribute to the Fomorians. He lost authority when he was satirized for neglecting his kingly duties of hospitality. Nuada was restored to the kingship after his arm was replaced with a working one of silver, but the Tuatha D\u00e9&#8217;s oppression by the Fomorians continued.<\/p>\n<p>Bres fled to his father, Elatha, and asked for his help to restore him to the kingship. Elatha refused, on the grounds that he should not seek to gain by foul means what he couldn&#8217;t keep by fair. Bres instead turned to Balor, a more warlike Fomorian chief living on Tory Island, and raised an army.<\/p>\n<p>The Tuatha D\u00e9 also prepared for war, under another half-Fomorian leader, Lug. His father was Cian of the Tuatha D\u00e9, and his mother was Balor&#8217;s daughter Ethniu. This is presented as a dynastic marriage in early texts, but folklore preserves a more elaborate story, reminiscent the story of Zeus and Cronus from Greek mythology. Balor, who had been given a prophecy that he would be killed by his own grandson, locked Ethniu in a glass tower to keep her away from men. But when he stole Cian&#8217;s magical cow, Cian got his revenge by gaining entry to the tower, with the help of a druidess called Bir\u00f3g, and seducing her. She gave birth to triplets, which Balor ordered drowned. Two of the babies either died or turned into the first seals, but Bir\u00f3g saved one, Lug, and gave him to Manannan and Tailtiu to foster. As an adult Lug gained entry to Nuada&#8217;s court through his mastery of every art, and was given command over the army.<\/p>\n<p>The Second Battle of Mag Tuireadh was fought between the Fomorians under Balor and the Tuatha D\u00e9 under Lug. Balor killed Nuada with his terrible, poisonous eye that killed all it looked upon. Lug faced his grandfather, but as he was opening his eye Lug shot a sling-stone that drove his eye out the back of his head, wreaking havoc on the Fomorian army behind. After Balor&#8217;s death the Fomorians were defeated and driven into the sea.<\/p>\n<p>The Tuatha D\u00e9 Danann and the Fomorians are closely related. Neit, a war god, is an ancestor of both.<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>The Training of C\u00fa Chulainn<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Fomorians were still around at the time of C\u00fa Chulainn. In the medieval Irish tale entitled <em>The Training of C\u00fa Chulainn<\/em>, preserved as a copy by Richard Tipper in British Library, Egerton 106, it gives the following mention:<\/p>\n<p>Then they parted from each other, and C\u00fachulainn went and looked forth on the great sea. As he was there he beheld a great assembly on the strand nearest to him, to wit, a hundred men and a hundred women seated in the bosom of the haven and the shore, and among them a maiden shapely, dear and beautiful, the most distinguished damsel of the world&#8217;s women, and they a-weeping and lamenting around the damsel. C\u00fachulainn came to the place and saluted them. \u2018What is this sorrow or the misery upon you?\u2019 says C\u00fachulainn. The damsel answered and this she said: \u2018A royal tribute which the tribe of Fomorians carry out of this country every seventh year, namely, the first-born of the king&#8217;s children. And at this time it has come to me to go as that tribute, for to the king I am the dearest of his children.\u2019\u2018What number comes to lift that tribute?\u2019 asks C\u00fachulainn. \u2018Three sons of Alatrom of the Fomorians,\u2019 she answers, \u2018and Dub, Mell and Dubros are their names.\u2019 Not long had they been at those talks when they saw the well-manned, full-great vessel approaching them over the furious waves of the sea. And when the damsel&#8217;s people saw the ship coming, they all fled from her, and not a single person remained in her company save only C\u00fachulainn. And thus was that vessel: a single warrior, dark, gloomy, devilish, on the stern of that good ship, and he was laughing roughly, ill-fatedly, so that every one saw his entrails and his bowels through the body of his gullet. \u2018What is that mirthfulness on the big man?\u2019 asks C\u00fachulainn.\u2018Because,\u2019 says the damsel, \u2018he deems it excellent that thou shouldst be an addition to his tribute in this year rather than in any other year.\u2019 \u2018By my conscience,\u2019 says C\u00fachulainn, \u2018it would not be right for him to brag thus regarding me if he knew what would come of it.\u2019 Then the big man came ashore to them into the strand, and stretched forth his long, sinewy, hideous arm to seize C\u00fachulainn in the very front of his royal tribute. Straightway C\u00fachulainn raised his right hand, and bared his sword, and gave a blow to the big man and struck off his head, so that he was the first that fell by C\u00fachulainn after having completed his training. And thereafter the other two fell by him, and he left them thus, neck to neck.<sup>[8]<\/sup><\/p>\n<p>In later times any settled pirates or seaborne raiders were labeled Fomorians and the original meaning of the word was forgotten.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Select list of texts<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><em>Cath Maige Tuired<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Lebor Gab\u00e1la \u00c9renn<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Togail Bruidne D\u00e1 Derga<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Lebor Bretnach<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Forfess Fer Falgae<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Elegy for Mess-Telmanm, Leinster prince<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>See also<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Domnu<\/li>\n<li>Irish mythology in popular culture<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>References<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Footnotes<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20171217165417\/http:\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fomorians#cite_ref-0\"><strong>^<\/strong><\/a> O\u2019Mulconry\u2019s Glossary in Dublin, TCD MS 1317, p. 42b, has &#8220;Fomoir .i. fo mhuir ut alii putant, ? a fomo fl{?}o ambiae fl{?}i acain a quo nominatunt{?}.&#8221; <em>Early Irish Glossaries Database<\/em>.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20171217165417\/http:\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fomorians#cite_ref-1\"><strong>^<\/strong><\/a> Rhys, <em>Lectures on the origin and growth of religion<\/em> (1888), p. 591.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20171217165417\/http:\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fomorians#cite_ref-2\"><strong>^<\/strong><\/a> &#8220;ein nach der See zu gelegenes Land&#8221;. Meyer, <em>\u00dcber die alteste irischen Dichtung II<\/em>, p. 6.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20171217165417\/http:\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fomorians#cite_ref-3\"><strong>^<\/strong><\/a> Stokes, &#8220;Second Battle of Moytura.&#8221; p. 128.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20171217165417\/http:\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fomorians#cite_ref-4\"><strong>^<\/strong><\/a> Thurneysen, <em>Die irische Helden- und K\u00f6nigsage bis zum siebzehnten Jahrhundert<\/em>. 2 vols. Halle: Max Niemeyer, 1921: 64.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20171217165417\/http:\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fomorians#cite_ref-5\"><strong>^<\/strong><\/a> Sjoestedt, <em>Gods and heroes of the Celts<\/em>, p. 5.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20171217165417\/http:\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fomorians#cite_ref-6\"><strong>^<\/strong><\/a> Note that there were also two Fir Bolg kings called Gann and Sengann<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20171217165417\/http:\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fomorians#cite_ref-7\"><strong>^<\/strong><\/a> <em>The Training of C\u00fa Chulainn<\/em>, ed. Stokes.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>Sources<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>&#8220;fom\u00f3ir&#8221;, <em>electronic Dictionary of the Irish Language<\/em>. Retrieved: 1-11-2009.<\/li>\n<li>Meyer, Kuno. <em>\u00dcber die \u00e4lteste irische Dichtung II. Rhythmische alliterierende reimlose Strophen<\/em>. Abhandlungen der K\u00f6niglich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin, 1914.<\/li>\n<li>Rhys, John. <em>Lectures on the origin and growth of religion as illustrated by Celtic heathendom<\/em>. London and Edinburgh, 1888. p. 490.<\/li>\n<li>Sjoestedt, Marie-Louise. <em>Gods and Heroes of the Celts<\/em>. London, 1949. Translation by Miles Dillon of Sjoestedt&#8217;s <em>Dieux et h\u00e9ros des Celtes<\/em>. Paris, 1940.<\/li>\n<li>Stokes, Whitley. &#8220;The Second Battle of Moytura.&#8221; <em>Revue Celtique<\/em> 12 (1891): 52-130, 306-08.<\/li>\n<li>Stokes, Whitley (ed. and tr.). &#8220;The Training of C\u00fachulainn.&#8221; <em>Revue Celtique<\/em> 29 (1908). pp. 109\u201347. Edition and translation available from CELT.<\/li>\n<li>Thurneysen, Rudolf. <em>Die irische Helden- und K\u00f6nigsage bis zum siebzehnten Jahrhundert<\/em>. 2 vols. Halle: Max Niemeyer, 1921.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Further reading<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Carey, John. &#8220;Native elements in Irish pseudohistory.&#8221; In <em>Cultural identity and cultural integration: Ireland and Europe in the early Middle Ages<\/em>, ed. Doris R. Edel. Blackrock: Four Courts, 1995. pp. 45-60. ISBN 1-85182-167-8.<\/li>\n<li>Gray, Elizabeth A. &#8220;<em>Cath Maige Tuired<\/em>: Myth and structure (24-120).&#8221; <em>\u00c9igse<\/em> 19 (1982). pp. 1\u201335.<\/li>\n<li>Gray, Elizabeth A. &#8220;<em>Cath Maige Tuired<\/em>: Myth and structure (84-93, 120-167).&#8221; <em>\u00c9igse<\/em> 19 (1983). pp. 230\u2013262.<\/li>\n<li>O&#8217;Rahilly, Thomas Francis. <em>Early Irish history and mythology<\/em>. Dublin, 1946.<\/li>\n<li>O&#8217;Brien, Michael A., ed.; Kelleher, John V. (intro. in the reprints of 1976 and 2005) (1962). <em>Corpus Genealogiarum Hiberniae<\/em>. <strong>1<\/strong>. Dublin: DIAS. ISBN 0901282316. OCLC 56540733.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>-That the Formorians came from <em>Beyond the sea\/ Over the horizon<\/em>, they are spoken of as being <em>Under the Sea<\/em>, and so were the Biblical Rephaim. This blog reprints the scriptures relating to the Rephaim elsewhere. It is also important to realise that the Giant Warrior Anakim were travelling with the People of the Sea at the collapse of the European Megalithic age and that is why Goliath was alongside the Philistines: the Philistines were People of the Sea that early on gained knowledge of iron weapons from the Hittites and for a while they held the monopoly on them in the Holy Lands.<\/p>\n<p>Quoting from my 2006 presentation of the theory in the Yahoo group\u00a0 Bronze Age World Diffusion:<\/p>\n<p>The Beaker Folk were evidently a<br \/>\ncoalition of traders whose basic identifiable culture mixes traits<br \/>\nfrom Spain, Britain and Central Europe originally, and at different<br \/>\ntimes in different parts of its period of influence was stone age,<br \/>\ncopper age and bronze age. The culture is credited with starting<br \/>\nmost of the Bronze age in Europe and building Stonehenge (among other<br \/>\nthings)<br \/>\nSeveral authors have seen the Beaker people as wealthy merchant<br \/>\nchieftans with a strong warrior tradition (archery items are<br \/>\nprominent among them) and with a religious hierarchy with priest-<br \/>\nkings that controlled vast wealth (and frequently were buried with<br \/>\nit; they were very obviously interested in gold and other metal ores)<br \/>\nSome similarities between the Adenas and the Beaker Folk (besides the<br \/>\nphysical similarities) were the characteristic conical burial mounds<br \/>\nthey made and the constructions of Woodhenges&#8211;evidently for<br \/>\ncelestial observations (and forerunners to stonehenge) and sometimes<br \/>\nas large circular religious buildings with an open circular plaza in<br \/>\nthe middle. They also favored similar cordmarked &#8220;Bell-Beaker&#8221;<br \/>\npottery and when forced by poverty to use chipped stone tools, their<br \/>\ndesigns for these are similar. They also favored a specific set of<br \/>\ngeometric designs as decorations, in particular nested diamond<br \/>\nshapes, but also similar animal abstract art when it occurs.<\/p>\n<p>The Beaker Folk and Adenas are different from their forebearers in<br \/>\nboth North America and Europe and represent a new physical type and<br \/>\nculture in both places, as mentioned by Barry Fell in <strong><u>Bronze Age<br \/>\nAmerica<\/u><\/strong>. Some authors have suggested that they were an &#8220;Atlantean<br \/>\nbrotherhood of mariners&#8221;, but this can be read simply as<br \/>\na &#8220;TransAtlantic&#8221; brotherhood instead. Physically, they seem to be<br \/>\nbased on Canary Islanders together with whatever European and<br \/>\nAmerican elements they took into their society: their aristocracy<br \/>\nwould seem to have been inbred, and showing recurrent recessive<br \/>\ntraits because of this.<br \/>\nThe mixing of the different peoples in the network would be why<br \/>\nFell&#8217;s Bronze Age America old Northmen were writing in Tifnaig, and<br \/>\nwhy some Canary Islanders ran to blondism when they were discovered<br \/>\nby the Spanish.<br \/>\nIt is my further opinion that they are related to the &#8220;White Incas&#8221;<br \/>\nwhose mummies are found in Peru and in the western USA, and who<br \/>\nfigure in Thor Heyerdahl&#8217;s KonTiki story, but that is a separate<br \/>\ndiscussion.This also deals wwith the Giants and Giant skulls reported<br \/>\nat Tiahuanaco, which would mean that the Giants who built Tiahuanaco<br \/>\nin Peru were directly related to the Beaker Folk &#8220;Giants&#8221; who built the<br \/>\n&#8220;Giant&#8217;s Dance&#8221; (Stonehenge) in England.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Above, European Bell Beaker with the characteristic Adena nested-diamond design. Below are a pair of Adena Bell Beakers similar to the European kinds.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Below, photographs from a &#8220;Racial typologies&#8221; work in the 1930s illustrating the Dinaric physical types, the one on the left from Germany and the one on the Right from Italy, both of them Beaker-folk survivors. The more extreme Dinarics have something of a &#8220;Frankenstein Monster&#8221; look, being very tall and with steep short skulls making them seem even taller.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>At left is a skull from a burial at Stonehenge: at right are North American types of skulls as illustrated by Neumann: Lenapid is the Algonquin type, Walcolid is the Adena type, both strongly suggestive of European skulls. The Walcolid or Adena type is usually deformed and made shorter front to back due to the habit of cradleboarding the infants.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Woodhenge. Woodhenges are found as characrteristic of both the Beaker Folk and of the Adena Mound Builders<\/p>\n<p>From <strong><u>&#8216;America B.C&#8217;<\/u><\/strong>. by Barry Fell.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;[Beaker]Pottery designs from Portugal, 4. New York and 5. New Hampshire.<br \/>\n[Pottery is of the type shown above]<br \/>\nThis type of pottery design was common on the shores of the Atlantic,<br \/>\nevidence of a seafaring culture that spanned the oceans over 3,000<br \/>\nyears ago.[the LAST date for this is given here as 1000BC]<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Yuri Kuchinski notes on Pan Atlantic similarities, that: &#8220;In both<br \/>\nEurope and the New World, at the very same time, Megalithic cultures<br \/>\narise around 4500 BC; then on both continents, at the very same time,<br \/>\ncopper-using Beaker-inspired cultures arise in 3000 BC. Next, the<br \/>\nBeaker Groups flee from conquest in 1500 BC, as the cultures of Western<br \/>\nEurope are disrupted by Celtic invasions. It is possible that some of<br \/>\nthese peoples migrated to America, and their Beaker cultural traits<br \/>\nbegan to be widespread in North America. This period also marks the<br \/>\nbeginning of the Olmec empire. Finally in both Europe and the New<br \/>\nWorld, at the very same time, Beaker-derived cultures collapse in 700<br \/>\nBC.&#8221; This claim is subsequently repeated and slightly elaborated\u00a0in<br \/>\n<strong><u>Bronze Age America<\/u><\/strong>. And Ignatius Donnelly already sensed a connection in 1881.<\/p>\n<p>The Beaker Folk, Adena Mound Builders and Olmecs all build round mounds of basically conical shape. Following is an internet encyclopedia&#8217;s information on Adenas [similarly printed in the group in December of 2006]<br \/>\n<strong>The Mound Builders<\/strong>The beginning of monumental architecture is currently being<br \/>\nreevaluated. The first monumental structures may have been built in<br \/>\nthe Middle Archaic &lt;USWoodlandArchaic.htm&gt;, as early as 4500 \u2013 4000<br \/>\ncal BC. More intensive mound building occurred during the Early and<br \/>\nMiddle Woodland Period, especially among the Adena culture.<br \/>\nThe Archaic Glacial Kame and Red Ochre cultures, located just to the<br \/>\nnorth and west of the Adena, foreshadow their development by burying<br \/>\ntheir dead in the natural mounds. Glacial Kame also shares some of<br \/>\nthe burial rituals, including cremation. These customs are thought to<br \/>\nreceive their full expression in the burial customs of the Adena.<br \/>\nThey built a large number of conical burial mounds or tumuli. Grave<br \/>\nCreek Mound, Moundsville, West Virginia is thought to be the largest,<br \/>\nmeasuring over 20 meters (69 feet) in height and over 90 meters (295<br \/>\nfeet) in diameter. Constructed over about a century in several<br \/>\nstages, it was probably built between 250 \u2013 150 BC. The Miamisburg<br \/>\nMound, Ohio, also thought to be an Adena mound, is of comparable<br \/>\nsize.<br \/>\nThe Adena constructed not only mounds, but also single causeway,<br \/>\ncircular enclosures, sometimes with an interior ditch. Typically<br \/>\nthese enclosures measured about 50 &#8211; 65 meters (150 &#8211; 200 feet) in<br \/>\ndiameter. One of the largest burial mound and sacred circle complexes<br \/>\nis on Wolf&#8217;s Plain on the Hocking River, in The Plains, Athens<br \/>\nCounty, Ohio.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The Adena Mounds<\/strong>About 1000 B.C. we can mark the beginning of a new period for man in<br \/>\nNorth America. This period, which lasted until about 700 A.D., is<br \/>\ncalled the Woodland Period. It is during this time that a new culture<br \/>\nemerged and made significant settlements in what is now known as West<br \/>\nVirginia. These people are known to us today by the general term of<br \/>\nthe Mound Builders. They were so named for their practice of creating<br \/>\nearthen burial mounds and other earthworks. The Mound Builders lived<br \/>\nover a wide range from the Atlantic, to the Midwest and the Ohio<br \/>\nValley to the Mississippi Valley. The term &#8220;mound builders&#8221; refers to<br \/>\nseveral cultures that span a period of about 20 centuries.<br \/>\nThe first group of people to develop this unique way of life were the<br \/>\nAdena people. From about 1000 B.C. to approximately 1 A.D. A later<br \/>\ngroup of Mound Builders, the Hopewell, lived from about 1 A.D. to 700<br \/>\nA.D. and represented a greater refinement over the earlier Adena<br \/>\nculture. Other cultures extended the Mound Builders to about 1300<br \/>\nA.D.<\/p>\n<p>The Adena built mounds generally ranging in size from 20 to 300 feet<br \/>\nin diameter. The Adena lived in a wide area including much of present<br \/>\nday Ohio, Indiana, West Virginia, Kentucky and parts of Pennsylvania<br \/>\nand New York. They had well-organized societies since the<br \/>\nconstruction of the mounds took a great deal of effort.<br \/>\nThe labor of many people must have been required since the Adena had<br \/>\nnot yet developed more sophisticated means of construction. The large<br \/>\namounts of earth had to be moved by the basket-load. Perhaps for this<br \/>\nreason, the mounds were often used more than once. We find in many<br \/>\nmounds there are multiple burials at different levels. Over a period<br \/>\nof time, the mounds gradually increased in size.<br \/>\nA majority of the people were cremated after death, placed in small<br \/>\nlog tombs and covered with earth. More important people were often<br \/>\nburied in the flesh and laid to rest with a variety of artifacts such<br \/>\nas flints, beads, pipes, and mica and copper ornaments.<br \/>\nThe Adena people were extensive traders as evidenced by the types of<br \/>\nmaterial found in the mounds they constructed. Copper from the<br \/>\nwestern Great Lakes region, mica from the Carolinas and shells from<br \/>\nthe Gulf of Mexico, all attest to the economic activity. In addition,<br \/>\nthe culture also practiced agriculture, hunting and fishing.<br \/>\nA typical Adena house was built in a circular form from 15 to 45 feet<br \/>\nin diameter. The walls were made of paired posts tilted outward,<br \/>\njoined to other wood to form a conical-shaped roof. The roof was<br \/>\ncovered with bark and the walls may have been bark, wickerwork or<br \/>\nsome combination.<br \/>\nBy about 500 B.C., the Adena culture began to slowly give way to a<br \/>\nmore sophisticated culture, the Hopewell. Although little remains of<br \/>\ntheir villages, the Adena left the mounds as great monuments to mark<br \/>\ntheir passing.<br \/>\n&#8230;&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p>In the book, <strong><u>The Natural and Aboriginal History of Tennessee<\/u><\/strong>, author<br \/>\nJohn Haywood describes; &#8220;very large&#8221; bones in stone graves found in<br \/>\nWilliamson County, Tennessee, in 1821. In White County, Tennessee,<br \/>\nan &#8220;ancient fortification&#8221; contained skeletons of gigantic stature<br \/>\naveraging at least 7 feet in length.<br \/>\nIn February and June of 1931, large skeletons were found in the<br \/>\nHumboldt lake bed near Lovelock, Nevada. The first of these two<br \/>\nskeletons found measured 8 1\/2 feet tall and appeared to have been<br \/>\nwrapped in a gum-covered fabric similar to the Egyptian manner. The<br \/>\nsecond skeleton was almost 10 feet long.(Review &#8211; Miner, June 19,<br \/>\n1931).<br \/>\nGeorge W. Hill, M.D., dug out a skeleton &#8220;of unusual size&#8221; in a mound<br \/>\nof Ashland County, Ohio. In 1879, a nine-foot, eight-inch skeleton<br \/>\nwas excavated from a mound near Brewersville, Indiana(Indianapolis<br \/>\nNews, Nov 10, 1975)<br \/>\nIn 1875 workmen were constructing a bridge near the mouth of Paw Paw<br \/>\nCreek at Rivesville. While digging through heavy clay soil they were<br \/>\nastonished to uncover three giant skeletons strands of reddish hair<br \/>\nclinging to the skulls. A local doctor was called to examine the<br \/>\nremains and was able ascertain after careful measurement, the<br \/>\nskeletons had supported people approximately 8 feet tall.<br \/>\nJust as black haired Greeks had an earlier past of taller blonder and<br \/>\nred haired people (the Titans), so did the Amerindians.<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/users.on.net\/~mkfenn\/page9.htm<br \/>\n&#8230;&#8230;..<\/p>\n<p><strong>Genetics, Antigens and Blood groups<\/strong><br \/>\n[Message at yahoo group Bronze Age World Diffusion, January 15\u00a02007]<br \/>\nI had done a little reading on this matter while in IU in Bloomington<br \/>\n(Indiana) working on my anthropology degree, and I found that there<br \/>\nwere faint traces of Old World genetic traits (especially in certain<br \/>\nblood groups, including rare traces of one type of Rhesus-negative<br \/>\ngroup cde) in Native Americans which probably represented inclusions<br \/>\nof preColumbian settlers and in two basic groups-the first and most<br \/>\nobvious being North\/Western European genetics in North America,<br \/>\npaticularly radiating out from the Hudson&#8217;s bay and St. Lawrence<br \/>\nSeaway centers, and the other radiating out from the Gulf of Mexico<br \/>\nand Northern South America with Mediterranean traits.<\/p>\n<p>I recently came across reference to genetic\/antibody studies that<br \/>\nconfirmed this latter supposition and even dated the arrival of this<br \/>\ngenetic influx to between 1500 and 500 BC&#8211;and with a secondary<br \/>\ninflux of early Indian (Dravidian) genetics from the Pacific at the<br \/>\nsame time. The East Asian\/Chinese genetic influx is basically non-<br \/>\ncontroversial, but it is not the ONLY line of gene flow into the<br \/>\nAmericas there is.<\/p>\n<p>Here is the source for that information;<br \/>\n&#8220;Genetics suggest a number of different arrivals of Eastern<br \/>\nMediterranean genes into Central and South America at about 1200B.C.<br \/>\nThere is also an Indian input into Venezuela about 500B.C.(James L<br \/>\nGuthrie -Human Lymphocyte Antigens, Pre-Columbiana, June 2001).<\/p>\n<p>One product of this merging of cultures is the Cuna Indians who have<br \/>\nEastern Mediterranean as well as Dravidian genetic and cultural<br \/>\ntraits. They even have a script related to Harrapan and Rongo Rongo<br \/>\nscript. All these three scripts read in the unique manner, whereby<br \/>\none must turn the script upside down for each successive line. This<br \/>\nis termed boustrophedon script. It is more than coincidence that reed<br \/>\nrafts, the Birdman cult and boustrophedon script keep re-occurring<br \/>\ntogether.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Link to info, https:\/\/users.on.net\/~mkfenn\/page4.htm<\/p>\n<p>It also discusses Peruvian tin-mining starting about 4000 BC with a<br \/>\nseries of &#8220;Ur&#8221; town names. It does not mention that tin ran out in<br \/>\nthe Mesopotamian area about this time and from then up until about<br \/>\n1000 BC, expeditions were sent out to &#8220;The sunset lands of the far<br \/>\nwest&#8221; for tin. I have a chart which shows this that I can scan. The<br \/>\nTartessians were in on the early part of this, then the Phoenicians<br \/>\nfollowed by the Carthaginians.That would explain who was<br \/>\ntransporting the giant warrior mercenaries back and forth<br \/>\nacross the Atlantic.<\/p>\n<p>The Mediterranean genetic influxes mentioned in the<br \/>\nGuthrie article quoted below have a range of probably<br \/>\n1500 to 750 BC and represent different genetic groups,<br \/>\nas I understand it.<\/p>\n<p>My own research on Native American skulls leads me to<br \/>\nbelieve that there are two distinct types of<br \/>\nMediterranean origin entering the Americas about<br \/>\nthen&#8211;in the Southern USA and Northern South America<br \/>\n(Amazon region to Peru)&#8211;with at least the specific<br \/>\nNorth-African\/Phoenician and Iberian types being<br \/>\nrepresented. This is similar to what Barry Fell said<br \/>\nin America BC but probably starts earlier than he<br \/>\nstated in that book: the two groups later being<br \/>\nrepresented specifically as the Zunis and the<br \/>\nHopewells (respectively). The same or similar types<br \/>\nare represented in Early Mesoamerican and Andean<br \/>\n(pre-Inca) skulls. They follow on an older type from<br \/>\n3000-4000 BC that could be from mixed Egyptian and<br \/>\nMesopotamian sources (both longheaded and shortheaded<br \/>\nor Armenoid types). This is once again on top of the<br \/>\npre-existing different varieties of Paleoindians and<br \/>\nare generally rarer. And there is the unexpected situation that the<br \/>\nAdena moundbuilders, European Beakerfolk, and some of the old<br \/>\nPeruvian (&#8220;White Inca&#8221;) skulls all fall together as being similar.<\/p>\n<p>My work on doing an analysis on the various skulls was summed<br \/>\nup in an academic paper I made in\u00a0 the mid-1990s for IUPUI<br \/>\nand for my\u00a0final paper\u00a0in Osteology there. Interestingly, the<br \/>\noldest type examined in that paper had distinctively Neanderthaloid<br \/>\nfeatures and that was not only my opinion, the instructor noted<br \/>\nthe fact herself in red ink on the original.<\/p>\n<p>Best Wishes, Dale D.<\/p>\n<p>Posted by Dale Drinnon at 12:17 PM<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>1 comment:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>alanborky<\/strong>March 18, 2012 at 2:24 PM<\/p>\n<p>Dale I really think you&#8217;re onto something with your cyclops\/pirate idea and the peculiar thing&#8217;s it&#8217;s right there out in plain sight unseen (by me at least) until you pointed it out.<\/p>\n<p>You also alerted me to a possibility which&#8217;d never occurred to me before.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve long suggested the story of Eve being made from Adam&#8217;s rib&#8217;s that era&#8217;s technical language for referring to the missing &#8216;rib&#8217; on the Y chromosome.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve also long suspected crossed spears and arrows etc&#8217;re (especially when a strong &#8216;magical&#8217; female component&#8217;s involved [viz Jesus on the cross with the three Marys plus his mother]) allude to the female X chromosome.<\/p>\n<p>I now finding myself wondering if the archetypal pirate devoid of a body part might be (amongst other things of course) a sort of avatar of the Y chromosome&#8230;?<\/p>\n<p>ReplyDelete<\/p>\n<p><strong>Add comment<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Load more&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This blog does NOT allow anonymous comments. All comments are moderated to filter out abusive and vulgar language and any posts indulging in abusive and insulting language shall be deleted without any further discussion.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Cian of the Tuatha D\u00e9, and his mother was Balor&#8217;s daughter Ethniu. This is presented as a dynastic marriage in early texts, but folklore preserves a more elaborate story, reminiscent the story of Zeus and Cronus from Greek mythology. Balor, who had been given a prophecy that he would be killed by his own grandson, locked Ethniu in a glass tower to keep her away from men. But when he stole Cian&#8217;s magical cow, Cian got his revenge by gaining entry to the tower, with the help of a druidess called Bir\u00f3g, and seducing her. She gave birth to triplets, which Balor ordered drowned. Two of the babies either died or turned into the first seals, but Bir\u00f3g saved one, Lug, and gave him to Manannan and Tailtiu to foster. As an adult Lug gained entry to Nuada&#8217;s court through his mastery of every art, and was given command over the army.<\/p>\n<p>The Second Battle of Mag Tuireadh was fought between the Fomorians under Balor and the Tuatha D\u00e9 under Lug. Balor killed Nuada with his terrible, poisonous eye that killed all it looked upon. Lug faced his grandfather, but as he was opening his eye Lug shot a sling-stone that drove his eye out the back of his head, wreaking havoc on the Fomorian army behind. After Balor&#8217;s death the Fomorians were defeated and driven into the sea.<\/p>\n<p>The Tuatha D\u00e9 Danann and the Fomorians are closely related. Neit, a war god, is an ancestor of both.<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>The Training of C\u00fa Chulainn<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Fomorians were still around at the time of C\u00fa Chulainn. In the medieval Irish tale entitled <em>The Training of C\u00fa Chulainn<\/em>, preserved as a copy by Richard Tipper in British Library, Egerton 106, it gives the following mention:<\/p>\n<p>Then they parted from each other, and C\u00fachulainn went and looked forth on the great sea. As he was there he beheld a great assembly on the strand nearest to him, to wit, a hundred men and a hundred women seated in the bosom of the haven and the shore, and among them a maiden shapely, dear and beautiful, the most distinguished damsel of the world&#8217;s women, and they a-weeping and lamenting around the damsel. C\u00fachulainn came to the place and saluted them. \u2018What is this sorrow or the misery upon you?\u2019 says C\u00fachulainn. The damsel answered and this she said: \u2018A royal tribute which the tribe of Fomorians carry out of this country every seventh year, namely, the first-born of the king&#8217;s children. And at this time it has come to me to go as that tribute, for to the king I am the dearest of his children.\u2019\u2018What number comes to lift that tribute?\u2019 asks C\u00fachulainn. \u2018Three sons of Alatrom of the Fomorians,\u2019 she answers, \u2018and Dub, Mell and Dubros are their names.\u2019 Not long had they been at those talks when they saw the well-manned, full-great vessel approaching them over the furious waves of the sea. And when the damsel&#8217;s people saw the ship coming, they all fled from her, and not a single person remained in her company save only C\u00fachulainn. And thus was that vessel: a single warrior, dark, gloomy, devilish, on the stern of that good ship, and he was laughing roughly, ill-fatedly, so that every one saw his entrails and his bowels through the body of his gullet. \u2018What is that mirthfulness on the big man?\u2019 asks C\u00fachulainn.\u2018Because,\u2019 says the damsel, \u2018he deems it excellent that thou shouldst be an addition to his tribute in this year rather than in any other year.\u2019 \u2018By my conscience,\u2019 says C\u00fachulainn, \u2018it would not be right for him to brag thus regarding me if he knew what would come of it.\u2019 Then the big man came ashore to them into the strand, and stretched forth his long, sinewy, hideous arm to seize C\u00fachulainn in the very front of his royal tribute. Straightway C\u00fachulainn raised his right hand, and bared his sword, and gave a blow to the big man and struck off his head, so that he was the first that fell by C\u00fachulainn after having completed his training. And thereafter the other two fell by him, and he left them thus, neck to neck.<sup>[8]<\/sup><\/p>\n<p>In later times any settled pirates or seaborne raiders were labeled Fomorians and the original meaning of the word was forgotten.<\/p>\n<p><strong>List of Fomorians<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Balor<\/li>\n<li>Bres<\/li>\n<li>Buarainech<\/li>\n<li>Cethlenn<\/li>\n<li>Cichol Gricenchos<\/li>\n<li>Conand<\/li>\n<li>Corb<\/li>\n<li>Elatha<\/li>\n<li>Ethniu<\/li>\n<li>Tethra<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Select list of texts<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><em>Cath Maige Tuired<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Lebor Gab\u00e1la \u00c9renn<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Togail Bruidne D\u00e1 Derga<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Lebor Bretnach<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Forfess Fer Falgae<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Elegy for Mess-Telmanm, Leinster prince<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>See also<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Domnu<\/li>\n<li>Irish mythology in popular culture<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>References<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Footnotes<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20171217165417\/http:\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fomorians#cite_ref-0\"><strong>^<\/strong><\/a> O\u2019Mulconry\u2019s Glossary in Dublin, TCD MS 1317, p. 42b, has &#8220;Fomoir .i. fo mhuir ut alii putant, ? a fomo fl{?}o ambiae fl{?}i acain a quo nominatunt{?}.&#8221; <em>Early Irish Glossaries Database<\/em>.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20171217165417\/http:\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fomorians#cite_ref-1\"><strong>^<\/strong><\/a> Rhys, <em>Lectures on the origin and growth of religion<\/em> (1888), p. 591.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20171217165417\/http:\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fomorians#cite_ref-2\"><strong>^<\/strong><\/a> &#8220;ein nach der See zu gelegenes Land&#8221;. Meyer, <em>\u00dcber die alteste irischen Dichtung II<\/em>, p. 6.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20171217165417\/http:\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fomorians#cite_ref-3\"><strong>^<\/strong><\/a> Stokes, &#8220;Second Battle of Moytura.&#8221; p. 128.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20171217165417\/http:\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fomorians#cite_ref-4\"><strong>^<\/strong><\/a> Thurneysen, <em>Die irische Helden- und K\u00f6nigsage bis zum siebzehnten Jahrhundert<\/em>. 2 vols. Halle: Max Niemeyer, 1921: 64.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20171217165417\/http:\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fomorians#cite_ref-5\"><strong>^<\/strong><\/a> Sjoestedt, <em>Gods and heroes of the Celts<\/em>, p. 5.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20171217165417\/http:\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fomorians#cite_ref-6\"><strong>^<\/strong><\/a> Note that there were also two Fir Bolg kings called Gann and Sengann<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20171217165417\/http:\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fomorians#cite_ref-7\"><strong>^<\/strong><\/a> <em>The Training of C\u00fa Chulainn<\/em>, ed. Stokes.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>Sources<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>&#8220;fom\u00f3ir&#8221;, <em>electronic Dictionary of the Irish Language<\/em>. Retrieved: 1-11-2009.<\/li>\n<li>Meyer, Kuno. <em>\u00dcber die \u00e4lteste irische Dichtung II. Rhythmische alliterierende reimlose Strophen<\/em>. Abhandlungen der K\u00f6niglich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin, 1914.<\/li>\n<li>Rhys, John. <em>Lectures on the origin and growth of religion as illustrated by Celtic heathendom<\/em>. London and Edinburgh, 1888. p. 490.<\/li>\n<li>Sjoestedt, Marie-Louise. <em>Gods and Heroes of the Celts<\/em>. London, 1949. Translation by Miles Dillon of Sjoestedt&#8217;s <em>Dieux et h\u00e9ros des Celtes<\/em>. Paris, 1940.<\/li>\n<li>Stokes, Whitley. &#8220;The Second Battle of Moytura.&#8221; <em>Revue Celtique<\/em> 12 (1891): 52-130, 306-08.<\/li>\n<li>Stokes, Whitley (ed. and tr.). &#8220;The Training of C\u00fachulainn.&#8221; <em>Revue Celtique<\/em> 29 (1908). pp. 109\u201347. Edition and translation available from CELT.<\/li>\n<li>Thurneysen, Rudolf. <em>Die irische Helden- und K\u00f6nigsage bis zum siebzehnten Jahrhundert<\/em>. 2 vols. Halle: Max Niemeyer, 1921.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Further reading<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Carey, John. &#8220;Native elements in Irish pseudohistory.&#8221; In <em>Cultural identity and cultural integration: Ireland and Europe in the early Middle Ages<\/em>, ed. Doris R. Edel. Blackrock: Four Courts, 1995. pp. 45-60. ISBN 1-85182-167-8.<\/li>\n<li>Gray, Elizabeth A. &#8220;<em>Cath Maige Tuired<\/em>: Myth and structure (24-120).&#8221; <em>\u00c9igse<\/em> 19 (1982). pp. 1\u201335.<\/li>\n<li>Gray, Elizabeth A. &#8220;<em>Cath Maige Tuired<\/em>: Myth and structure (84-93, 120-167).&#8221; <em>\u00c9igse<\/em> 19 (1983). pp. 230\u2013262.<\/li>\n<li>O&#8217;Rahilly, Thomas Francis. <em>Early Irish history and mythology<\/em>. Dublin, 1946.<\/li>\n<li>O&#8217;Brien, Michael A., ed.; Kelleher, John V. (intro. in the reprints of 1976 and 2005) (1962). <em>Corpus Genealogiarum Hiberniae<\/em>. <strong>1<\/strong>. Dublin: DIAS. ISBN 0901282316. OCLC 56540733.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>-That the Formorians came from <em>Beyond the sea\/ Over the horizon<\/em>, they are spoken of as being <em>Under the Sea<\/em>, and so were the Biblical Rephaim. This blog reprints the scriptures relating to the Rephaim elsewhere. It is also important to realise that the Giant Warrior Anakim were travelling with the People of the Sea at the collapse of the European Megalithic age and that is why Goliath was alongside the Philistines: the Philistines were People of the Sea that early on gained knowledge of iron weapons from the Hittites and for a while they held the monopoly on them in the Holy Lands.<\/p>\n<p>Quoting from my 2006 presentation of the theory in the Yahoo group\u00a0 Bronze Age World Diffusion:<\/p>\n<p>The Beaker Folk were evidently a<br \/>\ncoalition of traders whose basic identifiable culture mixes traits<br \/>\nfrom Spain, Britain and Central Europe originally, and at different<br \/>\ntimes in different parts of its period of influence was stone age,<br \/>\ncopper age and bronze age. The culture is credited with starting<br \/>\nmost of the Bronze age in Europe and building Stonehenge (among other<br \/>\nthings)<br \/>\nSeveral authors have seen the Beaker people as wealthy merchant<br \/>\nchieftans with a strong warrior tradition (archery items are<br \/>\nprominent among them) and with a religious hierarchy with priest-<br \/>\nkings that controlled vast wealth (and frequently were buried with<br \/>\nit; they were very obviously interested in gold and other metal ores)<br \/>\nSome similarities between the Adenas and the Beaker Folk (besides the<br \/>\nphysical similarities) were the characteristic conical burial mounds<br \/>\nthey made and the constructions of Woodhenges&#8211;evidently for<br \/>\ncelestial observations (and forerunners to stonehenge) and sometimes<br \/>\nas large circular religious buildings with an open circular plaza in<br \/>\nthe middle. They also favored similar cordmarked &#8220;Bell-Beaker&#8221;<br \/>\npottery and when forced by poverty to use chipped stone tools, their<br \/>\ndesigns for these are similar. They also favored a specific set of<br \/>\ngeometric designs as decorations, in particular nested diamond<br \/>\nshapes, but also similar animal abstract art when it occurs.<\/p>\n<p>The Beaker Folk and Adenas are different from their forebearers in<br \/>\nboth North America and Europe and represent a new physical type and<br \/>\nculture in both places, as mentioned by Barry Fell in <strong><u>Bronze Age<br \/>\nAmerica<\/u><\/strong>. Some authors have suggested that they were an &#8220;Atlantean<br \/>\nbrotherhood of mariners&#8221;, but this can be read simply as<br \/>\na &#8220;TransAtlantic&#8221; brotherhood instead. Physically, they seem to be<br \/>\nbased on Canary Islanders together with whatever European and<br \/>\nAmerican elements they took into their society: their aristocracy<br \/>\nwould seem to have been inbred, and showing recurrent recessive<br \/>\ntraits because of this.<br \/>\nThe mixing of the different peoples in the network would be why<br \/>\nFell&#8217;s Bronze Age America old Northmen were writing in Tifnaig, and<br \/>\nwhy some Canary Islanders ran to blondism when they were discovered<br \/>\nby the Spanish.<br \/>\nIt is my further opinion that they are related to the &#8220;White Incas&#8221;<br \/>\nwhose mummies are found in Peru and in the western USA, and who<br \/>\nfigure in Thor Heyerdahl&#8217;s KonTiki story, but that is a separate<br \/>\ndiscussion.This also deals wwith the Giants and Giant skulls reported<br \/>\nat Tiahuanaco, which would mean that the Giants who built Tiahuanaco<br \/>\nin Peru were directly related to the Beaker Folk &#8220;Giants&#8221; who built the<br \/>\n&#8220;Giant&#8217;s Dance&#8221; (Stonehenge) in England.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Above, European Bell Beaker with the characteristic Adena nested-diamond design. Below are a pair of Adena Bell Beakers similar to the European kinds.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Below, photographs from a &#8220;Racial typologies&#8221; work in the 1930s illustrating the Dinaric physical types, the one on the left from Germany and the one on the Right from Italy, both of them Beaker-folk survivors. The more extreme Dinarics have something of a &#8220;Frankenstein Monster&#8221; look, being very tall and with steep short skulls making them seem even taller.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>At left is a skull from a burial at Stonehenge: at right are North American types of skulls as illustrated by Neumann: Lenapid is the Algonquin type, Walcolid is the Adena type, both strongly suggestive of European skulls. The Walcolid or Adena type is usually deformed and made shorter front to back due to the habit of cradleboarding the infants.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Woodhenge. Woodhenges are found as characrteristic of both the Beaker Folk and of the Adena Mound Builders<\/p>\n<p>From <strong><u>&#8216;America B.C&#8217;<\/u><\/strong>. by Barry Fell.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;[Beaker]Pottery designs from Portugal, 4. New York and 5. New Hampshire.<br \/>\n[Pottery is of the type shown above]<br \/>\nThis type of pottery design was common on the shores of the Atlantic,<br \/>\nevidence of a seafaring culture that spanned the oceans over 3,000<br \/>\nyears ago.[the LAST date for this is given here as 1000BC]<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Yuri Kuchinski notes on Pan Atlantic similarities, that: &#8220;In both<br \/>\nEurope and the New World, at the very same time, Megalithic cultures<br \/>\narise around 4500 BC; then on both continents, at the very same time,<br \/>\ncopper-using Beaker-inspired cultures arise in 3000 BC. Next, the<br \/>\nBeaker Groups flee from conquest in 1500 BC, as the cultures of Western<br \/>\nEurope are disrupted by Celtic invasions. It is possible that some of<br \/>\nthese peoples migrated to America, and their Beaker cultural traits<br \/>\nbegan to be widespread in North America. This period also marks the<br \/>\nbeginning of the Olmec empire. Finally in both Europe and the New<br \/>\nWorld, at the very same time, Beaker-derived cultures collapse in 700<br \/>\nBC.&#8221; This claim is subsequently repeated and slightly elaborated\u00a0in<br \/>\n<strong><u>Bronze Age America<\/u><\/strong>. And Ignatius Donnelly already sensed a connection in 1881.<\/p>\n<p>The Beaker Folk, Adena Mound Builders and Olmecs all build round mounds of basically conical shape. Following is an internet encyclopedia&#8217;s information on Adenas [similarly printed in the group in December of 2006]<br \/>\n<strong>The Mound Builders<\/strong>The beginning of monumental architecture is currently being<br \/>\nreevaluated. The first monumental structures may have been built in<br \/>\nthe Middle Archaic &lt;USWoodlandArchaic.htm&gt;, as early as 4500 \u2013 4000<br \/>\ncal BC. More intensive mound building occurred during the Early and<br \/>\nMiddle Woodland Period, especially among the Adena culture.<br \/>\nThe Archaic Glacial Kame and Red Ochre cultures, located just to the<br \/>\nnorth and west of the Adena, foreshadow their development by burying<br \/>\ntheir dead in the natural mounds. Glacial Kame also shares some of<br \/>\nthe burial rituals, including cremation. These customs are thought to<br \/>\nreceive their full expression in the burial customs of the Adena.<br \/>\nThey built a large number of conical burial mounds or tumuli. Grave<br \/>\nCreek Mound, Moundsville, West Virginia is thought to be the largest,<br \/>\nmeasuring over 20 meters (69 feet) in height and over 90 meters (295<br \/>\nfeet) in diameter. Constructed over about a century in several<br \/>\nstages, it was probably built between 250 \u2013 150 BC. The Miamisburg<br \/>\nMound, Ohio, also thought to be an Adena mound, is of comparable<br \/>\nsize.<br \/>\nThe Adena constructed not only mounds, but also single causeway,<br \/>\ncircular enclosures, sometimes with an interior ditch. Typically<br \/>\nthese enclosures measured about 50 &#8211; 65 meters (150 &#8211; 200 feet) in<br \/>\ndiameter. One of the largest burial mound and sacred circle complexes<br \/>\nis on Wolf&#8217;s Plain on the Hocking River, in The Plains, Athens<br \/>\nCounty, Ohio.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The Adena Mounds<\/strong>About 1000 B.C. we can mark the beginning of a new period for man in<br \/>\nNorth America. This period, which lasted until about 700 A.D., is<br \/>\ncalled the Woodland Period. It is during this time that a new culture<br \/>\nemerged and made significant settlements in what is now known as West<br \/>\nVirginia. These people are known to us today by the general term of<br \/>\nthe Mound Builders. They were so named for their practice of creating<br \/>\nearthen burial mounds and other earthworks. The Mound Builders lived<br \/>\nover a wide range from the Atlantic, to the Midwest and the Ohio<br \/>\nValley to the Mississippi Valley. The term &#8220;mound builders&#8221; refers to<br \/>\nseveral cultures that span a period of about 20 centuries.<br \/>\nThe first group of people to develop this unique way of life were the<br \/>\nAdena people. From about 1000 B.C. to approximately 1 A.D. A later<br \/>\ngroup of Mound Builders, the Hopewell, lived from about 1 A.D. to 700<br \/>\nA.D. and represented a greater refinement over the earlier Adena<br \/>\nculture. Other cultures extended the Mound Builders to about 1300<br \/>\nA.D.<\/p>\n<p>The Adena built mounds generally ranging in size from 20 to 300 feet<br \/>\nin diameter. The Adena lived in a wide area including much of present<br \/>\nday Ohio, Indiana, West Virginia, Kentucky and parts of Pennsylvania<br \/>\nand New York. They had well-organized societies since the<br \/>\nconstruction of the mounds took a great deal of effort.<br \/>\nThe labor of many people must have been required since the Adena had<br \/>\nnot yet developed more sophisticated means of construction. The large<br \/>\namounts of earth had to be moved by the basket-load. Perhaps for this<br \/>\nreason, the mounds were often used more than once. We find in many<br \/>\nmounds there are multiple burials at different levels. Over a period<br \/>\nof time, the mounds gradually increased in size.<br \/>\nA majority of the people were cremated after death, placed in small<br \/>\nlog tombs and covered with earth. More important people were often<br \/>\nburied in the flesh and laid to rest with a variety of artifacts such<br \/>\nas flints, beads, pipes, and mica and copper ornaments.<br \/>\nThe Adena people were extensive traders as evidenced by the types of<br \/>\nmaterial found in the mounds they constructed. Copper from the<br \/>\nwestern Great Lakes region, mica from the Carolinas and shells from<br \/>\nthe Gulf of Mexico, all attest to the economic activity. In addition,<br \/>\nthe culture also practiced agriculture, hunting and fishing.<br \/>\nA typical Adena house was built in a circular form from 15 to 45 feet<br \/>\nin diameter. The walls were made of paired posts tilted outward,<br \/>\njoined to other wood to form a conical-shaped roof. The roof was<br \/>\ncovered with bark and the walls may have been bark, wickerwork or<br \/>\nsome combination.<br \/>\nBy about 500 B.C., the Adena culture began to slowly give way to a<br \/>\nmore sophisticated culture, the Hopewell. Although little remains of<br \/>\ntheir villages, the Adena left the mounds as great monuments to mark<br \/>\ntheir passing.<br \/>\n&#8230;&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p>In the book, <strong><u>The Natural and Aboriginal History of Tennessee<\/u><\/strong>, author<br \/>\nJohn Haywood describes; &#8220;very large&#8221; bones in stone graves found in<br \/>\nWilliamson County, Tennessee, in 1821. In White County, Tennessee,<br \/>\nan &#8220;ancient fortification&#8221; contained skeletons of gigantic stature<br \/>\naveraging at least 7 feet in length.<br \/>\nIn February and June of 1931, large skeletons were found in the<br \/>\nHumboldt lake bed near Lovelock, Nevada. The first of these two<br \/>\nskeletons found measured 8 1\/2 feet tall and appeared to have been<br \/>\nwrapped in a gum-covered fabric similar to the Egyptian manner. The<br \/>\nsecond skeleton was almost 10 feet long.(Review &#8211; Miner, June 19,<br \/>\n1931).<br \/>\nGeorge W. Hill, M.D., dug out a skeleton &#8220;of unusual size&#8221; in a mound<br \/>\nof Ashland County, Ohio. In 1879, a nine-foot, eight-inch skeleton<br \/>\nwas excavated from a mound near Brewersville, Indiana(Indianapolis<br \/>\nNews, Nov 10, 1975)<br \/>\nIn 1875 workmen were constructing a bridge near the mouth of Paw Paw<br \/>\nCreek at Rivesville. While digging through heavy clay soil they were<br \/>\nastonished to uncover three giant skeletons strands of reddish hair<br \/>\nclinging to the skulls. A local doctor was called to examine the<br \/>\nremains and was able ascertain after careful measurement, the<br \/>\nskeletons had supported people approximately 8 feet tall.<br \/>\nJust as black haired Greeks had an earlier past of taller blonder and<br \/>\nred haired people (the Titans), so did the Amerindians.<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/users.on.net\/~mkfenn\/page9.htm<br \/>\n&#8230;&#8230;..<\/p>\n<p><strong>Genetics, Antigens and Blood groups<\/strong><br \/>\n[Message at yahoo group Bronze Age World Diffusion, January 15\u00a02007]<br \/>\nI had done a little reading on this matter while in IU in Bloomington<br \/>\n(Indiana) working on my anthropology degree, and I found that there<br \/>\nwere faint traces of Old World genetic traits (especially in certain<br \/>\nblood groups, including rare traces of one type of Rhesus-negative<br \/>\ngroup cde) in Native Americans which probably represented inclusions<br \/>\nof preColumbian settlers and in two basic groups-the first and most<br \/>\nobvious being North\/Western European genetics in North America,<br \/>\npaticularly radiating out from the Hudson&#8217;s bay and St. Lawrence<br \/>\nSeaway centers, and the other radiating out from the Gulf of Mexico<br \/>\nand Northern South America with Mediterranean traits.<\/p>\n<p>I recently came across reference to genetic\/antibody studies that<br \/>\nconfirmed this latter supposition and even dated the arrival of this<br \/>\ngenetic influx to between 1500 and 500 BC&#8211;and with a secondary<br \/>\ninflux of early Indian (Dravidian) genetics from the Pacific at the<br \/>\nsame time. The East Asian\/Chinese genetic influx is basically non-<br \/>\ncontroversial, but it is not the ONLY line of gene flow into the<br \/>\nAmericas there is.<\/p>\n<p>Here is the source for that information;<br \/>\n&#8220;Genetics suggest a number of different arrivals of Eastern<br \/>\nMediterranean genes into Central and South America at about 1200B.C.<br \/>\nThere is also an Indian input into Venezuela about 500B.C.(James L<br \/>\nGuthrie -Human Lymphocyte Antigens, Pre-Columbiana, June 2001).<\/p>\n<p>One product of this merging of cultures is the Cuna Indians who have<br \/>\nEastern Mediterranean as well as Dravidian genetic and cultural<br \/>\ntraits. They even have a script related to Harrapan and Rongo Rongo<br \/>\nscript. All these three scripts read in the unique manner, whereby<br \/>\none must turn the script upside down for each successive line. This<br \/>\nis termed boustrophedon script. It is more than coincidence that reed<br \/>\nrafts, the Birdman cult and boustrophedon script keep re-occurring<br \/>\ntogether.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Link to info, https:\/\/users.on.net\/~mkfenn\/page4.htm<\/p>\n<p>It also discusses Peruvian tin-mining starting about 4000 BC with a<br \/>\nseries of &#8220;Ur&#8221; town names. It does not mention that tin ran out in<br \/>\nthe Mesopotamian area about this time and from then up until about<br \/>\n1000 BC, expeditions were sent out to &#8220;The sunset lands of the far<br \/>\nwest&#8221; for tin. I have a chart which shows this that I can scan. The<br \/>\nTartessians were in on the early part of this, then the Phoenicians<br \/>\nfollowed by the Carthaginians.That would explain who was<br \/>\ntransporting the giant warrior mercenaries back and forth<br \/>\nacross the Atlantic.<\/p>\n<p>The Mediterranean genetic influxes mentioned in the<br \/>\nGuthrie article quoted below have a range of probably<br \/>\n1500 to 750 BC and represent different genetic groups,<br \/>\nas I understand it.<\/p>\n<p>My own research on Native American skulls leads me to<br \/>\nbelieve that there are two distinct types of<br \/>\nMediterranean origin entering the Americas about<br \/>\nthen&#8211;in the Southern USA and Northern South America<br \/>\n(Amazon region to Peru)&#8211;with at least the specific<br \/>\nNorth-African\/Phoenician and Iberian types being<br \/>\nrepresented. This is similar to what Barry Fell said<br \/>\nin America BC but probably starts earlier than he<br \/>\nstated in that book: the two groups later being<br \/>\nrepresented specifically as the Zunis and the<br \/>\nHopewells (respectively). The same or similar types<br \/>\nare represented in Early Mesoamerican and Andean<br \/>\n(pre-Inca) skulls. They follow on an older type from<br \/>\n3000-4000 BC that could be from mixed Egyptian and<br \/>\nMesopotamian sources (both longheaded and shortheaded<br \/>\nor Armenoid types). This is once again on top of the<br \/>\npre-existing different varieties of Paleoindians and<br \/>\nare generally rarer. And there is the unexpected situation that the<br \/>\nAdena moundbuilders, European Beakerfolk, and some of the old<br \/>\nPeruvian (&#8220;White Inca&#8221;) skulls all fall together as being similar.<\/p>\n<p>My work on doing an analysis on the various skulls was summed<br \/>\nup in an academic paper I made in\u00a0 the mid-1990s for IUPUI<br \/>\nand for my\u00a0final paper\u00a0in Osteology there. Interestingly, the<br \/>\noldest type examined in that paper had distinctively Neanderthaloid<br \/>\nfeatures and that was not only my opinion, the instructor noted<br \/>\nthe fact herself in red ink on the original.<\/p>\n<p>Best Wishes, Dale D.<\/p>\n<p>Posted by Dale Drinnon at 12:17 PM<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>1 comment:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>alanborky<\/strong>March 18, 2012 at 2:24 PM<\/p>\n<p>Dale I really think you&#8217;re onto something with your cyclops\/pirate idea and the peculiar thing&#8217;s it&#8217;s right there out in plain sight unseen (by me at least) until you pointed it out.<\/p>\n<p>You also alerted me to a possibility which&#8217;d never occurred to me before.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve long suggested the story of Eve being made from Adam&#8217;s rib&#8217;s that era&#8217;s technical language for referring to the missing &#8216;rib&#8217; on the Y chromosome.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve also long suspected crossed spears and arrows etc&#8217;re (especially when a strong &#8216;magical&#8217; female component&#8217;s involved [viz Jesus on the cross with the three Marys plus his mother]) allude to the female X chromosome.<\/p>\n<p>I now finding myself wondering if the archetypal pirate devoid of a body part might be (amongst other things of course) a sort of avatar of the Y chromosome&#8230;?<\/p>\n<p>ReplyDelete<\/p>\n<p><strong>Add comment<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Load more&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This blog does NOT allow anonymous comments. All comments are moderated to filter out abusive and vulgar language and any posts indulging in abusive and insulting language shall be deleted without any further discussion.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Newer Post Older Post Home<\/p>\n<p>Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Frontiers of Anthropology This blog is to encorporate discussions on Lost Continents, Catastrophism, The origin of Modern Humans and the Out of Africa theory, Genetics and Human Diversity, The Origin and Spread of Civilization and Cultural Diffusion across the face of the Globe. Deluge of Atlantis Deluge of Atlantis Friday, March 16, 2012 More on [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5322],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-43677","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-archive"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43677","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=43677"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43677\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=43677"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=43677"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=43677"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}