{"id":52451,"date":"2021-12-16T08:39:34","date_gmt":"2021-12-16T08:39:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/?p=52451"},"modified":"2021-12-29T09:19:51","modified_gmt":"2021-12-29T09:19:51","slug":"archive-6248","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/archive-6248\/","title":{"rendered":"Archive 6248"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>REVIEW OF<br>THE SEA OF DISCOURSES IN CONRAD\u2019S TEXTS<br>MAREK PACUKIEWICZ, DYSKURS ANTROPOLOGICZNY<br>W PISARSTWIE JOSEPHA CONRADA.<br>KRAK\u00d3W: UNIVERSITAS, 2008<br>Agnieszka Adamowicz-Po?piech<br>Numerous dissertations, monographs and articles have been written on Conrad and<br>it would be difficult to find a blank space in the field of Conradian studies that could be<br>filled with impressive meanders of interpretation. Yet Marek Pacukiewicz has achieved<br>what seems almost unachievable: he has discovered a new relation between Conrad<br>and the sea \u2013 or, to be precise, between Conrad and the sea of discourses.<br>With great erudition Pacukiewicz outlines the semantic area that the sea has occupied in European culture. As early as in ancient Greece, people tried to capture and<br>describe the essence of \u2018sea-ness\u2019. This was done by means of three concepts:pelagos<br>(the open sea, space), pontos (a bridge) and hals (saltiness). However, from the very<br>beginning the nature of the sea eluded the formal and curbing bridle of language and<br>one more notion \u2013 of older Cretan etymology \u2013 appeared, namely thalassa (the sea).<br>From the onset, then, within the fabric of language, which was engaged in naming<br>reality (and thus ordering it, making it submissive to Man), there occurred a covert<br>fissure \u2013 a difference of contexts. It clearly demarcated the boundaries or the hiatus<br>of two cultures and two diverse cultural contexts: that of the Greek mainland and that<br>of thalassic Crete (Pacukiewicz 11).<br>Pacukiewicz painstakingly traces the connotations of these terms in Greek civilization and reveals how the initial opposition between pontos and pelagos(in other words,<br>between the familiar and the foreign) gradually ebbed. In the end the colonized sea<br>changes into a bridge \u201cjoining the polis with the colonies\u201d (17). The open space ceases<br>to be, owing to its indeterminacy, a boundary and becomes transformed into a space<br>that is propitious for sailing with the mind (19). The metaphor of sailing as gaining<br>knowledge has been unearthed by Pacukiewicz in the writings of Plato and Aristotle.<br>It is they who first collated epistemeand the sea. \u201cThis mode of reasoning leads us to<br>the fact that knowledge can be present by means of one ripple both in the polisand<br>168 Agnieszka Adamowicz-Po?piech<br>in the colony\u201d (20). Pacukiewicz traces the protean metaphor of the sea, which in<br>the cradle of European civilization takes the form of \u201ca fertile area of knowledge\u201d.<br>In the 19<br>th<br>century the sea \u2013 engulfed by the \u2018rationalized\u2019 earth \u2013 became transformed<br>into an epistemological trope (18). The simile of the sea and sailing emerges in the<br>evolutionary anthropology of Edward Burnett Tylor. The distinctive feature of this<br>stage is the belief in the continuity and homogeneity of knowledge.<br>It is at this time that the sea evolves into a machine for transforming the unknown<br>into the map of knowledge, the representation of familiarized terrain. Furthermore, in<br>19<br>th<br>-century discourse of culture the sea becomes a metaphor for the subject. Pacukiewicz<br>illustrates his thesis with the works of Charles Baudelaire, Arthur Rimbaud, Dante,<br>Gabriel Rossetti and Alfred Tennyson. The sea, being the mirror of subjectivity, is<br>filled with interpretations concerning the inner side of Man, while \u201cthe deep becomes<br>a pretext to disarm and contextualize mystery\u201d (20). Pacukiewicz juxtaposes the<br>aforementioned discourse of culture with Conrad\u2019s text, where one cannot find any<br>speculations about marine depths \u2013 on the contrary, the deep is always located on the<br>surface. Conrad chooses remote territories that bewilder, emphasizing the specific<br>discourses and trying to find a breach between them. \u201cHe does not look at the land<br>from the sea in order to chart the shape of the land, nor does he look from the land<br>to the sea in order to gain an opportunity to fill the marine space with discourse. The<br>world and the sea are quite different, though, when perceived from the perspective of<br>a narrow sandy shoal: enormous and unfathomable and at the same time immovable<br>\u2013 this is precisely \u2018sea-ness\u2019\u201d (21).<br>Towards the end of the 19<br>th<br>century the sea turned into a space that was saturated<br>with boundless interpretations. Poets, novelists and scientists shaped the scope of the<br>oceans in their own ways and for their own particular needs. It is this type of sea \u2013 which<br>ceases to be a synonym for the homogeneous truth and changes into an accumulation<br>of discourses \u2013 that interests Pacukiewicz most. He compares visions of the sea in<br>Nietzsche and Conrad. In the writings of the German philosopher we discern the sea<br>of eternity, whereas in Conrad we pursue a dependable craft of the subject \u201cthrough<br>which we perceive the sea\u201d (26). In Pacukiewicz\u2019s opinion, Conrad focuses on the<br>finality and repetitiveness (of traditions) and within their realm he searches for that<br>breach, fissure, difference or thalassa.<br>Coming back to the domesticated context of pontos,pelagosand hals, Pacukiewicz<br>states that Conrad, remaining within the domain of European episteme, at the same<br>time adopts an innovative writing strategy. Namely, he exposes the interplay of relations between the specific parts of the discourse of pontos,pelagosand hals, pointing<br>to their separateness or even the disparity between them. \u201cThe components of knowledge are not on a par, quite the opposite: they fight for dominance in Man, while the<br>systemic obviousness and rhetorical functionality of knowledge \u2013 which man creates<br>and on which he would like to rely \u2013 are illusory\u201d (28). Conrad shows this by thickening the web of oppostitions. Upholding the sea-land antinomy, he superimposes on it<br>the axis of travels, which is both the mark of division and a framework. Starting with<br>169 Review of The Sea of Discourses in Conrad\u2019s Texts<br>the above-mentioned prime opposition of sea and land, Conrad differentiates space<br>by creating among Man, sea and land a complex web of boundaries (28). The Polish<br>scholar knowledgeably identifies the keystones of Conrad\u2019s texts. Although apparently<br>rootless, a mariner is not able to sever himself completely from the land and from<br>his culture. One of Conrad\u2019s central motifs is the probing of that knowledge which is<br>transmitted by Man. At these moments the difference of cultures is revealed owing to<br>the hiatus between context and knowledge. Conrad is interested in transgressive situations, in which it is impossible to separate or shield one\u2019s own system of knowledge<br>from the surge of the foreign. For Pacukiewicz \u2018Typhoon\u2019 serves as an epitome of the<br>case when the well-ordered space of knowledge is disrupted by the destructive \u201celement<br>of the Far East.\u201d At such moments Conrad observes how Man behaves in a situation<br>which is not culturally and epistemologically standardized (30).<br>A reading ofThe Mirror of the Seamakes Pacukiewicz think that for Conrad the<br>sea becomes \u201ca shadow line\u201d \u2013 a kind of illness which the subject must go through<br>\u2013 rites de passage, which break the stereotypes of the sea and restore its \u2018sea-ness\u2019 (31).<br>The scholar claims that Conrad reveals how \u201cthe active dimension of context may be<br>appropriated by discourse\u201d (32). Pacukiewicz summarises thus: \u201cwhat can be heard in<br>Conrad\u2019s voice is the swoosh of the ocean of discourses; Man continuously attempts<br>to mediate dialectically between the reality of the world and the world of knowledge.<br>Conrad shows that this process never ends in complete synthesis\u201d (31). According to<br>Pacukiewicz the vision of the sea in Conrad\u2019s writing in a way reflects the writer\u2019s way<br>of thinking about culture as Man\u2019s reality, consisting of pontos,pelagos andhals (39).<br>Conrad\u2019s texts encourage us, the readers, to sail, but not on the smooth territory of<br>the pelagos, where in case of danger we discern a safe passage via the pontos; on the<br>contrary, we are lured to the stormy sea of the thalassa, where shallows and crevices<br>make peaceful sailing impossible. What course should be taken so that our ship is not<br>eventually blown off course? We will not discover any definitive interpretation of the<br>signs in this journey. However, Conrad seems to hint that we should observe the relations between interpretations and how they complete or falsify one another. We must<br>be aware of any sandy shoal or fissure and traverse it anew.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>REVIEW OFTHE SEA OF DISCOURSES IN CONRAD\u2019S TEXTSMAREK PACUKIEWICZ, DYSKURS ANTROPOLOGICZNYW PISARSTWIE JOSEPHA CONRADA.KRAK\u00d3W: UNIVERSITAS, 2008Agnieszka Adamowicz-Po?piechNumerous dissertations, monographs and articles have been written on Conrad andit would be difficult to find a blank space in the field of Conradian studies that could befilled with impressive meanders of interpretation. Yet Marek Pacukiewicz has achievedwhat seems [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5322],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-52451","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-archive"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52451","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=52451"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52451\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":52452,"href":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52451\/revisions\/52452"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=52451"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=52451"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlantipedia.ie\/samples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=52451"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}