Archive 3316
By LEONARDO VINTIÑI
???????????????????????????
There is an ancient culture that flourished in Mesoamerica
around 1100 A.D. still baffling historians—the
mysterious Olmecs. Their religious rituals are far from
completely understood, but so too are their origins. How
did this culture that appeared seemingly overnight go on
to exhibit such an enormous influence on the rest of the
region?
According to several authors, including Mike Xu,
professor of Chinese studies at the University of Central
Oklahoma, the Olmecs are descendants of ancient Chinese.
The evidence? The Olmec culture began around
1100 A.D., some years after the fall of China’s Shang dynasty
(1766 to 1122 B.C.). According to ancient chronicles
of that era, when the Zhou were invading and plundering
the Shang, records state that the son of the emperor
brought 25,000 adepts toward the “eastern ocean.” According
to Mike Xu, these were the first Olmec people.
At that time in history, China’s ocean fleet was the
most advanced of the day. Some historians propose that
these Chinese travelers could have arrived on the American
coast thanks to the “black current.” Known as Kuro
Shiwo or “current of death” in Japanese, this Pacific current
would have been capable of navigating an ancient
Chinese sailor to the Americas. In his article for the sailing
magazine 48 Degrees North, “Are We Living in the
Land of Fusang?” Hewitt R. Jackson writes that there is
evidence of similar pre-Columbian Chinese sea voyages
that have already been confirmed:
“Probably the best documented account that has been
studied is that of Hwui Chan (Hoei Shin). He was a “chamen”
or mendicant priest who had made his way from
Afghanistan among the first of the Buddhist missionaries
to reach China. This was a period of great expansion
for Buddhism and extraordinary journeys by land
and sea were common for the “cha-men.” Hwui Chan
sailed to the Americas some five hundred years before
Leif Erickson and a thousand before Columbus. His description
of the land he visited seems to indicate that he
passed by California and settled in Mexico. After a stay
of forty years he returned to China in 499 A.D. and related
the story of his labors and travels to Wu Ti, the Emperor.
The story of Fusang was at that time well known
in China. This eventually has been recognized and accepted
by western scholars, but for some reason it has
fallen out of fashion in our history and literature within
the past century.”
While the black current explains the journey, ancient
Olmec artifacts give the theory further substance. The
written language found on the Olmecs’ jars, pottery,
and statues reveals what could be the actual influence
of Chinese culture. Professor Xu points out that various
words found on these decorative objects match exactly
with those used in Shang China: Sun, Mountain, Artist,
Water, Rain, Sacrifice, Health, Plants, Wealth, and Earth.
In fact, the majority of the 146 characters used by the Olmecs
are exactly the same as primitive Chinese writing.
When Xu showed the Olmec artifacts to university students
involved in analyzing primitive Chinese culture,
they actually believed it was ancient Chinese script.
While most Mesoamerican scholars do not accept
Xu’s theory—critics have labeled him “the most dangerous
person in Mesoamerican research”—it nevertheless
offers insights about the mysterious Olmecs that more
accepted theories cannot reach.
In her letter to Science Magazine in 2005, Betty J.
Meggers of the National Museum of Natural History at
the Smithsonian Institution criticizes most Mesoamerican
scholars’ failure to acknowledge Xu’s comparisons:
“The invention of writing revolutionized Chinese society
by facilitating communication among speakers of 60 mutually
unintelligible languages and resulted in increased
commercial interaction and social integration. The rapid
diffusion of Olmec iconography and associated cultural
elaboration suggests it had the same impact across multilingual
Mesoamerica. The demise of the Shang Empire
circa 1500 B.C.E. coincides with the emergence of Olmec
civilization. Rather than speculate in a vacuum on the intangible
character of Olmec society, it would seem profitable
to compare the archaeological remains with the detailed
record of the impact of writing on the development
of Chinese civilization. What do we have to lose?”