Dublin
Scharff, R. F.
Robert Francis Scharff (1856-1934) was born in Britain of German parents. He is best known as the director of the Natural History Museum in Dublin at the beginning of the 20th century.
He was of the opinion that there had been a land bridge between Europe and America, which had also been home to Atlantis. Dr Scharff addressed the Royal Irish Academy on at least two occasions[539][540] on this subject. However, in 1899 he published The History of the European Fauna[1027] in which he made an even earlier reference to “the old landbridge between Europe and North America, which is generally known by the name of Atlantis.”(p.49)
>In a short paper(a) titled Some Remarks on the Atlantis Problem, delivered to the British Association in Belfast in 1902, Scharff reported “The results of my investigations tend to show that Madeira and the Azores are the remains of an ancient tertiary area of land which was joined to Europe, and that it probably became disconnected in Miocene times. Since then this land once more became united with our Continent, and may not have been finally severed until the Pleistocene period. As regards the question of a landbridge across the Atlantic, many reasons can be given in favour of such a theory. It must, however, have occupied a position farther south than the land just alluded to.” Although the idea of trans-Atlantic landbridges soon lost favour, the Azores and Madeira are still advocated by some as the remnants of Atlantis.<
Scharff among others of his day was strongly opposed to the idea that extensive ice sheets had covered huge areas of Europe and North America during the last Ice Age.
In a later book, Distribution and Origin of Life in America [1159]+, he offered further faunal evidence in support of an Atlantean landbridge in the Atlantic and quotes Professor Heinrich Simroth (1851-1917), who posited a landbridge from Portugal to the West Indies (p.213).
In 1926, Lewis Spence wrote[259.56] of Scharff as having “contributed more valuable data to the literature of Atlantean research than any other living scientist.”
Theodor Arldt (1878-1960), a German geographer, expressed similar views in 1907 regarding an Atlantic land bridge but placed it in the Miocene Epoch millions of years ago.
[1027]+ http://www.forgottenbooks.com/readbook/The_History_of_the_European_Fauna_1000205601#3
[1159]+ http://www.forgottenbooks.com/readbook/Distribution_and_Origin_of_Life_in_America_1000137980
(a) [PDF] V.—Some Remarks on the Atlantis Problem. | Semantic Scholar *
Luce, John Victor
John Victor Luce (1920-2011)(b) was born in Dublin and educated at Cheltenham College, England and Trinity College, Dublin, where he graduated with First Class Honours in Classics and Philosophy in 1942. Among other academic honours, he was a lecturer in Greek at Glasgow University, visiting professor in classics at Trinity College, Hartford, Connecticut and was emeritus professor of classics at Trinity College, Dublin.
>In 1968, Luce was a guest lecturer on a cruise ship in the Mediterranean. As they were heading for Crete and Santorini he addressed the subject of the Minoans and their possible association with the story of Atlantis. In the audience was the well-known archaeologist Sir Mortimer Wheeler, who commissioned Luce to expand on the details of his lecture, which led to the publication of The End of Atlantis a year later.<This was published under slightly different titles, in the UK, The End of Atlantis[120] and in the USA, Lost Atlantis: New Light on an Old Legend [121]. During a panel discussion [122] hosted by Indiana University in 1975, Professor Luce presented his view that Plato’s story was a mixture of fact and fiction.
In his book, The End of Atlantis, highlighted[0120.14] how various Greek myths and legends have been proven to contain historical elements and that consequently Plato’s Atlantis story should be studied with this in mind.
He was of the view that the description of Atlantis closely matched that of the 16th century BC Minoan empire.
Nevertheless, Peter James in The Sunken Kingdom [047] suggested that Luce’s enthusiastic support for the Minoan Hypothesis had ‘cooled’ when he subsequently wrote ln Edwin Ramage’s Atlantis: Fact or Fiction? [522.67]. “To go further (as I did in The End of Atlantis), and to hypothesise that Plato acquired some garbled information about Minoan Crete from Egyptian sources, is to venture on less firm ground…..A reviewer of my book wrote that there is a ‘sporting chance’ that the Minoan hypothesis is correct. I myself have never put it higher than that.”
Luce encapsulates[120.24] the Atlantis narrative in the following terms; “ I have in mind what Aristotle would call the ‘essential plot’: a great and highly civilised island empire aims at universal domination and is defeated by the early Greeks, especially the Athenians, and later succumbs to a natural cataclysm. On this framework Plato embroiders a large number of remarkable details.” In 1994 Luce wrote a brief paper [123](a) reviewing the Thera evidence in the light of contemporary scientific discoveries. Luce also suggested that the eruption of Thera was the inspiration behind details in Hesiod’s Theogony[0120.128].
(a) https://web.archive.org/web/20150728042644/https://www.ucd.ie/cai/classics-ireland/1994/Luce94.html See {Archive 2061}
(b) https://web.archive.org/web/20181125154702/https://www.tcd.ie/Classics/jvl/ See {Archive 2060}